Skip to content

Conversation

@undingen
Copy link
Contributor

I chose IC slot size heuristic just by running a few times the benchmarks and taking the best one, we may want to adjust it later.

           django_template3.py             2.2s (6)             2.2s (2)  -0.5%
                 pyxl_bench.py             1.9s (6)             1.8s (2)  -3.8%
     sqlalchemy_imperative2.py             2.3s (6)             2.3s (2)  -1.3%
                pyxl_bench2.py             1.5s (6)             1.3s (2)  -14.5%
       django_template3_10x.py            14.3s (6)            14.2s (2)  -0.5%
             pyxl_bench_10x.py            14.7s (6)            13.9s (2)  -5.4%
 sqlalchemy_imperative2_10x.py            18.1s (6)            17.4s (2)  -3.4%
            pyxl_bench2_10x.py            13.8s (6)            11.6s (2)  -15.9%
                       geomean                 5.4s                 5.1s  -5.9%

@kmod
Copy link
Collaborator

kmod commented Oct 20, 2015

Wow, 15% (even on pyxl_bench2) is pretty impressive :)

kmod added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2015
LLVM tier: adjust num of IC slots depending on the num of times the IC got rewritten in the bjit tier
@kmod kmod merged commit 5472b5e into pyston:master Oct 20, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants