Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Self contained call loops #102

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 19, 2017

Conversation

goodboy
Copy link
Contributor

@goodboy goodboy commented Nov 18, 2017

This fixes #99 as well as removes any direct references to _HookCaller inside of the multi call loops.
This makes the call loops fully self contained without requiring any knowledge of overlying abstractions.

Tyler Goodlet added 3 commits November 13, 2017 16:36
Triggers a regression introduced during refactoring of the multicall
loop. Demonstrates the issue described in pytest-dev#99.
Multi-call loop(s) should not care about spec opts - only whether
or not the first result should be returned.
Fix issue where a collected but unmarked hook not having
`_HookCaller.spec_opts` defined results in an attr error.

Resolves pytest-dev#99
@goodboy goodboy changed the title Expose spec opts regresion Self contained call loops Nov 18, 2017
Copy link
Member

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nicely found, good work 👍

self.name = name
self._wrappers = []
self._nonwrappers = []
self._hookexec = hook_execute
self._specmodule_or_class = None
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good unification 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Project name based collection triggers regression
2 participants