-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document #1540 #1541
Document #1540 #1541
Conversation
@@ -563,6 +563,29 @@ def assert_markers(self, items, **expected): | |||
if isinstance(v, MarkInfo)]) | |||
assert marker_names == set(expected_markers) | |||
|
|||
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason='callspec2.setmulti missuses keywords') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nitpick: missuses -> misuses
Nice work |
Anything else here? Can we merge this? |
i was jsut waiting for someone to merge it |
I guess everyone was waiting on the nitpick mentioned by @The-Compiler 😁 Feel free to go ahead if you don't have the time to fix it now, it is a nitpick after all |
i#ll fix it and do the merge :) |
@nicoddemus wasn't the py26 issue fixed ? or do we need that master merge finalized |
Seems like it... do you have changes on |
nah, this is features branch vs master branch :/ |
Oh wait, this PR is targeting |
this pr ads a xfailing test for #1540 based on the bug report
fixing it is dependent on #1534 and followups