Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add alternative ways to install python-lsp-server #245

Closed
nougcat opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #248
Closed

Add alternative ways to install python-lsp-server #245

nougcat opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #248
Milestone

Comments

@nougcat
Copy link
Contributor

nougcat commented Jul 13, 2022

Currently in main README file, the only way listed to install it is - through pip, which is probably fine way, but it would be great to see more clean and elegant ways to install it, like through official linux repos (for example fedora, debian/deb-based OSes or arch), or maybe some people on windows can install it using conda

If i can get a permission, i can also write it myself and submit it as PR.

@ccordoba12
Copy link
Member

ccordoba12 commented Jul 13, 2022

Hey @nougcat, thanks for interest in wanting to help us improve our docs. You don't need write permissions to do it, simply create a fork and send us a pull request with your changes.

@jgarte
Copy link

jgarte commented Jul 24, 2022

@nougcat Can also be installed with GNU/Guix

@nougcat
Copy link
Contributor Author

nougcat commented Jul 24, 2022

@jgarte It is also available in opensuse, solus and others, but package for it is named everywhere the same (except for alpine). So i think that it only makes sens to show installation instruction only for the biggest distros, so readme won't become unnecessarily long

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 added this to the v1.6.0 milestone Aug 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants