treat collections in packages as immutable #663
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
intended as a more-or-less maintainable version of #618. See also python-poetry/poetry#8671
by annotating collection types in packages as immutable, we "prove" that the shallow copy is a safe way to clone them
of course this is still not too hard to break: just by adding in something mutable later.
I see performance improvement during locking by about 20-25% on a couple of sample projects. It's not a complete no-brainer to me that this is change is safe enough to accept, but I think it probably is: and that's a good amount of performance to leave on the table. Still, I'm ready to be overruled.