You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As I'm currently juggling several PRs and since the added xfail's on 3.12 it's not possible to see the ✔️ vs ❌ on a PR to see at a glance if it passes test. But, as soon as the first result is pushed to codecov it will fail and display ❌, until however longer time later when enough results have come in that it passes. I'd personally much prefer if it was possible to mark it as not giving a result until all results are in, so I can rely on the status icon of ✔️ vs ❌ vs 🟡.
One solution would be:
One thought I have on this, though, is that what Hynek advocates for in his article https://hynek.me/articles/ditch-codecov-python/ could be useful here too. Maybe, if we merged all the reports on the GHA side and made just a single upload to Codecov, it could help with the rate limit just enough for this CI to have the best of two worlds: stability + ability to view coverage on Codecov's web UI.
As I'm currently juggling several PRs and since the added xfail's on 3.12 it's not possible to see the ✔️ vs ❌ on a PR to see at a glance if it passes test. But, as soon as the first result is pushed to codecov it will fail and display ❌, until however longer time later when enough results have come in that it passes. I'd personally much prefer if it was possible to mark it as not giving a result until all results are in, so I can rely on the status icon of ✔️ vs ❌ vs 🟡.
One solution would be:
as mentioned in #2672 (review)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: