Skip to content

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

Sign in

Sign up

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

python / cpython Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 30.1k
Star 62.9k

Code
Issues 5k+
Pull requests 1.7k
Actions
Projects 27
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Check labels

[3.13] Improve `pyrepl` type-annotation coverage (GH-119081) #89477

Sign in to view logs

Sign in to view logs

[3.13] Improve `pyrepl` type-annotation coverage (GH-119081)

[3.13] Improve `pyrepl` type-annotation coverage (GH-119081) #89477

Summary
Jobs
- DO-NOT-MERGE / unresolved review
Run details
- Usage
- Workflow file

Usage Workflow file

DO-NOT-MERGE / unresolved review

succeeded May 22, 2024 in 2s

Loading

Re-running jobs...

You can’t perform that action at this time.

[3.13] Improve pyrepl type-annotation coverage (GH-119081) #89477

DO-NOT-MERGE / unresolved review

DO-NOT-MERGE / unresolved review

Re-running jobs...

[3.13] Improve `pyrepl` type-annotation coverage (GH-119081) #89477