Consider adding test_type_aliases and test_type_params to PGO suite

[sobolevn]

Feature or enhancement

After #110277 I thought that there are several new modules that excercise some new C modules / types:

• test_type_params
• test_type_aliases

I believe that these test are quite important, because they basically cover some parts of python grammar. So, should I add them to the pgo suite?

CC @vstinner

[sobolevn]

And maybe even test_typing?

[vstinner]

CC @vstinner

I'm not the right person to ask about performance and trying PGO build.

@gvanrossum: Any idea if something should be done to optimize Python performance for the typing module?

[JelleZijlstra]

I don't have good intuition on what should and should not be added to the PGO build, but here's some thoughts:

• On the plus side, these tests are really fast (I just ran test_type_params in 198 ms, test_type_aliases in 76 ms, and test_typing in 677 ms). So if we add them, the cost is low in terms of slowing down the PGO build.
• On the negative side, I'm not sure it helps us all that much. The code paths exercised by these typing tests generally shouldn't be hot at runtime (you only execute your type annotations once), so having PGO focus on it doesn't seem all that helpful.