You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
// Use deferred reference counting for top-level functions, but not
// nested functions because they are more likely to capture variables,
// which makes prompt deallocation more important.
_PyObject_SetDeferredRefcount((PyObject*)op);
}
This also excludes functions defined on nested classes. In the example below, the Foo.__init__ function will not use deferred reference counting because the __init__ method's code object has the CO_NESTED flag set.
deffunc():
classFoo:
def__init__(self):
pass
We would like to relax the restriction on CO_NESTED to allow functions that are defined on nested classes to use deferred reference counting.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
We currently only defer functions that do not have the
CO_NESTED
flag set:cpython/Objects/funcobject.c
Lines 213 to 218 in 26ff32b
This also excludes functions defined on nested classes. In the example below, the
Foo.__init__
function will not use deferred reference counting because the__init__
method's code object has theCO_NESTED
flag set.We would like to relax the restriction on
CO_NESTED
to allow functions that are defined on nested classes to use deferred reference counting.Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: