-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-103558: Add coverage tests for argparse #103570
Merged
hauntsaninja
merged 16 commits into
python:main
from
gaogaotiantian:argparse-coverage-improve
Jun 5, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1cb706c
Add coverage tests for argparse
gaogaotiantian 78a4ffe
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] 2fe75c6
Remove a wrong & useless line
gaogaotiantian 5a6a9c3
Update 2023-04-15-23-26-16.gh-issue-103558.w9OzK4.rst
gaogaotiantian 3423900
Update 2023-04-15-23-26-16.gh-issue-103558.w9OzK4.rst
gaogaotiantian 6d9224a
Revert version changes
gaogaotiantian fdb9929
Use captured_stderr
gaogaotiantian 2460a79
Update 2023-04-15-23-26-16.gh-issue-103558.w9OzK4.rst
gaogaotiantian 7b53ac9
Add positional append/extend tests
gaogaotiantian f3e6cb5
Merge branch 'main' into argparse-coverage-improve
hauntsaninja 65ef854
Merge branch 'main' into argparse-coverage-improve
gaogaotiantian 4b2b1f6
this comment explains test coverage, but isn't useful in general
hauntsaninja c3db2b6
"impossible" is a strong word :-)
hauntsaninja 81f2322
remove comment that i don't understand the code well enough to verify
hauntsaninja effbb7b
remove incorrect docstrings
hauntsaninja 033d112
restore tests
hauntsaninja File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-04-15-23-26-16.gh-issue-103558.w9OzK4.rst
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fixed ``parent`` argument validation mechanism of :mod:`argparse`. Improved test coverage. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are there any other options on what can be actually passed here? Why it was like that? It is introduced in a pretty old commit without any mentions of "why": 698a18a
Maybe some structural subtyping? optparse?
However, it is documented that
parents
must be a list ofArgumentParser
objects:So, I guess it is ok.