-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-104223: Fix issues with inheriting from buffer classes #104227
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b7fb7a4
Fix buffer classes using super()
JelleZijlstra c717784
Fix bf_releasebuffer in child classes
JelleZijlstra 9fcb214
Merge branch 'main' into pep688fix
JelleZijlstra 88ce24d
Add a test
JelleZijlstra 80a4b0b
Deal with __release_buffer__ saving references to the buffer
JelleZijlstra 6e31664
Add another test
JelleZijlstra b73e29c
More paranoid bufferwrapper_releasebuf
JelleZijlstra 15ad02d
that did not work
JelleZijlstra 9ded873
Update Objects/typeobject.c
JelleZijlstra 3b50138
Update Objects/typeobject.c
JelleZijlstra 056efee
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into pep688fix
JelleZijlstra 9ee8eb5
Better message for new flag
JelleZijlstra 5536853
More tests
JelleZijlstra 02d7b9c
Merge branch 'main' into pep688fix
JelleZijlstra File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a test in which the class has multiple inheritance? Also tests for when there are two or classes in mro which support buffer protocol?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding some tests. It's hard to come up with a case where multiple bases support the C buffer protocol, because that will almost inevitably lead to:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, maybe try one var length and one pure python type which implements buffer protocol.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, just pushed. Thanks for the review!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, you would have to write a custom type in C whose layout doesn't conflicts for that. Probably an object which has just object header and supports buffer protocol.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH, I agree this is an edge case but I try to be extra careful when touching
typeobject
, hope you don't mind the extra work.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better to catch this now then right before 3.12 final!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed the bug I outlined above, I'll have to step out for a few hours and fix it after that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking about it more, that crash isn't actually due to PEP 688: it reproduces without any Python
__buffer__
method. So I don't think there's any more interesting cases to cover for PEP 688.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Filed #104297 for that case.