-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-101100: Docs: Check Sphinx warnings and fail if improved #106460
Conversation
Marked as draft to make some temporary commits to demonstrate errors. First, the new check finds five files that no longer contain warnings!
https://github.com/python/cpython/actions/runs/5468129112/jobs/9955353278?pr=106460 Some of these files were deleted along with PEP 594's dead batteries. Others have been "accidentally" fixed since |
Adding a (temporary) warning to
Plus the file is annotated. https://github.com/python/cpython/actions/runs/5468217855/jobs/9955568557?pr=106460 (Edit: output updated per 3522e2c) |
Updating from main finds a new file that's been fixed! 🎉
|
Thanks @hugovk for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12. |
Sorry @hugovk, I had trouble checking out the |
3.12 doesn't yet have the refactored |
Looks like that was landed and this is required to backport #108065 , so retrying the backport. |
Thanks @hugovk for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12. |
Sorry, @hugovk, I could not cleanly backport this to |
…thon#106460) (cherry picked from commit 806d7c9)
…ved (pythonGH-106460). (cherry picked from commit 806d7c9) Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
GH-108116 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
Had to manually backport it due to conflicts in .nitignore, and might need to resolve a few additional discrepancies there once it builds. |
…ved (pythonGH-106460). (cherry picked from commit 806d7c9) Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
…H-106460) (#108116) * gh-101100: Docs: Check Sphinx warnings and fail if improved (#106460) (cherry picked from commit 806d7c9) * [3.12] gh-101100: Docs: Check Sphinx warnings and fail if improved (GH-106460). (cherry picked from commit 806d7c9) Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Recently I improved some colour contrast for Pygments, and they have a file of current contrast ratios. If they're improved by a PR, the CI will fail to make sure the ratio constants are updated, to ensure continual improvement with no regressions.
This is a good idea!
Let's add it here, to check if any files in
.nitignore
(which may have Sphinx warnings) switch to having no warnings. Then we can remove them from.nitignore
to make sure they remain free of warnings.I was going to add another Sphinx build, a fourth, to touch the relevant files, so only those would be rebuilt. But four builds is far too many!
Instead, let's build only once and save the warnings to a file. Then we can process the file and do the three phases:
.nitignore
(new!)📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--106460.org.readthedocs.build/