Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gh-113054: Compiler no longer replaces a redundant jump with no line number by a NOP #113139

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023
Merged

gh-113054: Compiler no longer replaces a redundant jump with no line number by a NOP #113139

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

iritkatriel
Copy link
Member

@iritkatriel iritkatriel commented Dec 14, 2023 •
edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2023
Closed
@iritkatriel @AlexWaygood
parens in test
8910217 
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
@AlexWaygood @chris-eibl
Fix docs typo
aa31aa9 
Co-authored-by: chris-eibl <138194463+chris-eibl@users.noreply.github.com>
@iritkatriel iritkatriel merged commit e51b400 into python:main Dec 19, 2023
34 checks passed
ryan-duve pushed a commit to ryan-duve/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2023
@iritkatriel @ryan-duve
pythongh-113054: Compiler no longer replaces a redundant jump with no…
e5573a7 
… line number by a NOP (python#113139)
aisk pushed a commit to aisk/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2024
@iritkatriel @aisk
pythongh-113054: Compiler no longer replaces a redundant jump with no…
db834e5 
… line number by a NOP (python#113139)
Glyphack pushed a commit to Glyphack/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
@iritkatriel @Glyphack
pythongh-113054: Compiler no longer replaces a redundant jump with no…
c29ba17 
… line number by a NOP (python#113139)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left review comments

@chris-eibl chris-eibl chris-eibl left review comments

@carljm carljm carljm approved these changes

@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon markshannon is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Python/flowgraph.c:1813: void insert_superinstructions(cfg_builder *): Assertion `no_redundant_nops(g)' failed
4 participants
@iritkatriel @carljm @AlexWaygood @chris-eibl