-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-119560: Drop an Invalid Assert in PyState_FindModule() #119561
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ericsnowcurrently
requested review from
kumaraditya303,
brettcannon,
ncoghlan and
warsaw
as code owners
May 25, 2024 18:57
ericsnowcurrently
removed request for
brettcannon,
warsaw,
ncoghlan and
kumaraditya303
May 25, 2024 19:09
Thanks @ericsnowcurrently for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
…ongh-119561) The assertion was added in pythongh-118532 but was based on the invalid assumption that PyState_FindModule() would only be called with an already-initialized module def. I've added a test to make sure we don't make that assumption again. (cherry picked from commit 0c5ebe1) Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
GH-119632 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
ericsnowcurrently
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
…119561) (gh-119632) The assertion was added in gh-118532 but was based on the invalid assumption that PyState_FindModule() would only be called with an already-initialized module def. I've added a test to make sure we don't make that assumption again. (cherry picked from commit 0c5ebe1) Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
ericsnowcurrently
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
The fix in gh-119561 introduced an assertion that doesn't hold true if any of the three new test extension modules are loaded more than once. This is fine normally but breaks if the new test_check_state_first() is run more than once, which happens for refleak checking and with the regrtest --forever flag. We fix that here by clearing each of the three modules after loading them. We also tweak a check in _modules_by_index_check().
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
The fix in pythongh-119561 introduced an assertion that doesn't hold true if any of the three new test extension modules are loaded more than once. This is fine normally but breaks if the new test_check_state_first() is run more than once, which happens for refleak checking and with the regrtest --forever flag. We fix that here by clearing each of the three modules after loading them. We also tweak a check in _modules_by_index_check(). (cherry picked from commit ae7b176) Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
ericsnowcurrently
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
…9633) The fix in gh-119561 introduced an assertion that doesn't hold true if any of the three new test extension modules are loaded more than once. This is fine normally but breaks if the new test_check_state_first() is run more than once, which happens for refleak checking and with the regrtest --forever flag. We fix that here by clearing each of the three modules after loading them. We also tweak a check in _modules_by_index_check(). (cherry picked from commit ae7b176) Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
estyxx
pushed a commit
to estyxx/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2024
…ongh-119561) The assertion was added in pythongh-118532 but was based on the invalid assumption that PyState_FindModule() would only be called with an already-initialized module def. I've added a test to make sure we don't make that assumption again.
estyxx
pushed a commit
to estyxx/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2024
The fix in pythongh-119561 introduced an assertion that doesn't hold true if any of the three new test extension modules are loaded more than once. This is fine normally but breaks if the new test_check_state_first() is run more than once, which happens for refleak checking and with the regrtest --forever flag. We fix that here by clearing each of the three modules after loading them. We also tweak a check in _modules_by_index_check().
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The assertion was added in gh-118532 but was based on the invalid assumption that
PyState_FindModule()
would only be called with an already-initialized module def. I've added a test to make sure we don't make that assumption again.