Skip to content

[3.13] gh-117657: Fix itertools.count thread safety (GH-119268) #120007

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

[3.13] gh-117657: Fix itertools.count thread safety (GH-119268) #120007

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

colesbury
Copy link
Contributor

@colesbury colesbury commented Jun 3, 2024 •
edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading

Fix itertools.count in free-threading mode
(cherry picked from commit 87939bd)

@wiggin15 @colesbury
[3.13] pythongh-117657: Fix itertools.count thread safety (pythonGH-1…
5576e64 
…19268)

Fix itertools.count in free-threading mode
(cherry picked from commit 87939bd)

Co-authored-by: Arnon Yaari <wiggin15@yahoo.com>
@colesbury colesbury requested a review from DinoV June 3, 2024 22:10
@colesbury colesbury requested a review from rhettinger as a code owner June 3, 2024 22:10
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2024
Merged
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2024
Open
@colesbury colesbury enabled auto-merge (squash) June 3, 2024 22:33
@colesbury colesbury merged commit 79fae3b into python:3.13 Jun 3, 2024
32 checks passed
@colesbury colesbury deleted the backport-87939bd-3.13 branch July 16, 2024 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@DinoV DinoV Awaiting requested review from DinoV

@rhettinger rhettinger Awaiting requested review from rhettinger rhettinger is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news topic-free-threading
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@colesbury @wiggin15