Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
gh-120754: Refactor I/O modules to stash whole stat result rather than individual members #123412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-120754: Refactor I/O modules to stash whole stat result rather than individual members #123412
Changes from all commits
508aa9d
9d849ce
bfcfcf2
3122665
8f5cfe4
d18a82d
c55d10e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do wonder how realistic the st_blksize values, when available, are for performance purposes, I guess we'll find out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR should not change the buffer size, does it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#117151 (comment) investigated
st_blksize
a bit previously. This PR I tried not to change buffer size at all / just change how it is accessed.Have with the refactors + optimizations been watching for new issues. Are finding some as people test
main
(ex. gh-113977 which I wrote a primary fix for #122101, and have more fix ideas on top of the stat_atopen changes)