Skip to content

[3.13] For-else deserves its own section in the tutorial (GH-123946) #124564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Sep 25, 2024

  • For-else deserves its own section in the tutorial

  • remove mention of unrolling the loop

  • Update Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst

Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com


(cherry picked from commit ffdc80e)

Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder ned@nedbatchelder.com
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--124564.org.readthedocs.build/

* For-else deserves its own section in the tutorial

* remove mention of unrolling the loop

* Update Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst

Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>

---------

(cherry picked from commit ffdc80e)

Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Sep 25, 2024
@Yhg1s Yhg1s merged commit 56467a6 into python:3.13 Sep 26, 2024
30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants