Skip to content

Conversation

@colesbury
Copy link
Contributor

@colesbury colesbury commented Dec 17, 2025

The function was already changed to use a relaxed atomic store.

The function was already changed to use a relaxed atomic store.
@colesbury colesbury requested a review from Yhg1s December 17, 2025 15:56
@colesbury colesbury changed the title gh-129748: Remove suppression for mi_block_set_nextx gh-129748: Remove TSan suppression for mi_block_set_nextx Dec 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@corona10 corona10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, not sure why I didn't remove this.

@colesbury colesbury merged commit 6e625f8 into python:main Dec 17, 2025
44 checks passed
@colesbury colesbury deleted the gh-129748-remove-suppression branch December 17, 2025 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants