Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Dec 16, 2020

  • bpo-42644: Validate values in logging.disable()

Technically make the value of manager a property that checks and convert
values assigned to it properly. This has the side effect of making
logging.disable also accept strings representing the various level of
warnings.

We want to validate the type of the disable attribute at assignment
time, as it is later compared to other levels when emitting warnings and
would generate a TypeError: '>=' not supported between .... in a
different part of the code base, which can make it difficult to track
down.

When assigned an incorrect value; it will raise a TypeError when the
wrong type, or ValueError if an invalid str.

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov andrew.svetlov@gmail.com
(cherry picked from commit b32d8b4)

Co-authored-by: Matthias Bussonnier bussonniermatthias@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue42644

* bpo-42644: Validate values in logging.disable()

Technically make the value of manager a property that checks and convert
values assigned to it properly. This has the side effect of making
`logging.disable` also accept strings representing the various level of
warnings.

We want to validate the type of the disable attribute at assignment
time, as it is later compared to other levels when emitting warnings and
would generate a `TypeError: '>=' not supported between ....` in a
different part of the code base, which can make it difficult to track
down.

When assigned an incorrect value; it will raise a TypeError when the
wrong type, or ValueError if an invalid str.

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit b32d8b4)

Co-authored-by: Matthias Bussonnier <bussonniermatthias@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Carreau and @asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Carreau and @asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit db63da7 into python:3.9 Dec 16, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-b32d8b4-3.9 branch December 16, 2020 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants