Skip to content

Feature/replace list comp with generator #26046

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

zkneupper
Copy link
Contributor

Replace list comprehensions with generator expressions inside str.join()

  • Replace list comprehensions with generator expressions inside str.join() in several places in Lib/_pydecimal.py and Lib/argparse.py
  • Replace a for loop with generator expression in Lib/ast.py

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Recognized GitHub username

We couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames:

@zkneupper

This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor

erlend-aasland commented May 12, 2021

Hi, and thank you for your interest in making CPython faster. Unfortunately, these changes are de-optimisations; list comprehensions are faster than generators. See Serhiy's review comment in #25798 (comment)

Copy link
Member

@isidentical isidentical left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is making the code look worse for the _pad_whitespace. Thanks for the contribution (are these automated?) though please refrain from posting this kind of changes in the future for the different parts of the codebase. If you know a potential improvement, open an issue and send a PR for that issue only.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants