-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-43858: Add logging.getLevelNamesMapping() #26459
bpo-43858: Add logging.getLevelNamesMapping() #26459
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This needs tests. In particular it should add tests that a copy is returned.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
I have made the requested changes; please review again |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @ericvsmith: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking good to me. @vsajip : I'll let you have the final word.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
Added a function that returns a copy of a dict of logging levels: func::`logging.getLevelNamesMapping()` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that I look at this: isn't the correct syntax:
:func:`logging.getLevelNamesMapping`
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right, well spotted!
@vsajip @ericvsmith Pushed an update per comments, please take a look! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the one small item I mentioned, this looks good to me.
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
Added a function that returns a copy of a dict of logging levels: :func:`logging.getLevelNamesMapping()` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding is that :func:
adds the parens, so you should leave them off in this message. I've looked at other files, and they don't have the parens.
@ericvsmith I fixed the parens, please take a look.. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Accidental double-definition in test?
Lib/test/test_logging.py
Outdated
@@ -4390,6 +4390,15 @@ def rec(): | |||
self.assertNotIn("Cannot recover from stack overflow.", err) | |||
self.assertEqual(rc, 1) | |||
|
|||
def test_get_level_names_mapping(self): | |||
def test_get_level_names_mapping(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think you meant this double level of indentation! That causes the test to do nothing effective 😞
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops, somehow doubling made it hard to spot for me..
@vsajip Fixed the doubled test.. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This all looks good to me. Thanks, @akulakov !
@ericvsmith and @vsajip much thanks for the help with the PR! |
Added a function that returns a copy of a dict of logging levels.
https://bugs.python.org/issue43858