-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.6k
bpo-46906: Mention PY_BIG_ENDIAN in PyFloat_Pack8() doc #31832
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So if your platform is little-endian, then passing
PY_BIG_ENDIAN
uses a little-endian format? That seems confusing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PY_BIG_ENDIAN is 1 on big endian platform, and 0 on little endian platform.
int.to_bytes() uses the native endian by default (if the
byte_order
parameter is not set). Maybe we could accept -1 to mean "use native endian"?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It uses big-endian by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops. You're right. I now recall a long discussion about the default :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, but it's primarily a problem with the naming of
PY_BIG_ENDIAN
, which would perhaps be better spelled as something likePY_PLATFORM_ENDIAN_IS_BIG_ENDIAN
.But usage of
PY_BIG_ENDIAN
is at least a little bit problematic, since there's nothing anywhere in C that guarantees that integer types and float types will use the same endianness (or even that float types have to follow one of big-endian or little-endian at all).I'd suggest leaving it as-is - it's easy enough to pass
PY_BIG_ENDIAN
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I proposed a different wording for the documentation: PR #31866. Is it better?