-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-32912: Upgrade warning for invalid escape sequences from silent to non-silent #5849
Conversation
c->c_filename, LINENO(n), | ||
NULL, NULL) < 0) | ||
{ | ||
if (PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_DeprecationWarning)) { | ||
if (PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_SyntaxWarning)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See the comment below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the end goal here is to get a SyntaxError, however this is not yet possible as we have to wait for two releases before this can happen, so we can't yet convert it to a SyntaxError. I probably should update that comment, though (I'll do that tomorrow when I get home).
@@ -6109,7 +6109,7 @@ PyUnicode_DecodeUnicodeEscape(const char *s, | |||
if (result == NULL) | |||
return NULL; | |||
if (first_invalid_escape != NULL) { | |||
if (PyErr_WarnFormat(PyExc_DeprecationWarning, 1, | |||
if (PyErr_WarnFormat(PyExc_SyntaxWarning, 1, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not related to syntax.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This warning was added back in 3.6 when we started deprecating the invalid escapes. In 3.8, we're upgrading these to SyntaxWarning so that they're no longer silent by default, and it will eventually be a SyntaxError. The end goal here is to raise a SyntaxError for this use, but this will have to wait for two more releases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This warning is emitted by the "unicode-escape" codec.
>>> b'\\z'.decode('unicode-escape')
__main__:1: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\z'
'\\z'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ PyObject *PyBytes_DecodeEscape(const char *s, | |||
if (result == NULL) | |||
return NULL; | |||
if (first_invalid_escape != NULL) { | |||
if (PyErr_WarnFormat(PyExc_DeprecationWarning, 1, | |||
if (PyErr_WarnFormat(PyExc_SyntaxWarning, 1, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not related to syntax.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This warning was added back in 3.6 when we started deprecating the invalid escapes. In 3.8, we're upgrading these to SyntaxWarning so that they're no longer silent by default, and it will eventually be a SyntaxError. The end goal here is to raise a SyntaxError for this use, but this will have to wait for two more releases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, this warning is emitted by codecs.escape_decode()
(which is used in pickle).
>>> codecs.escape_decode(b'\\z')
__main__:1: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\z'
(b'\\z', 2)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The codecs module shouldn't raise SyntaxWarning or SyntaxError. It should raise DeprecationWarning, which later will be converted to UnicodeDecodeError.
I haven't had the time to work on this, sorry! I'll get back to it hopefully sometime soon. |
I think this was done with #9652 and the bpo issue is also marked as resolved. |
What the title says. Properly tested and ready for 3.8!
https://bugs.python.org/issue32912
:EDIT:
I don't know how to add a NEWS entry, but I have to go for now. I'll look into that tomorrow.