Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.11] gh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs (GH-92792) #93967

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jun 17, 2022

Per @brettcannon 's suggestions on the Discourse thread, discussed in GH-92611 and as a followup to PR GH-92612 , this PR add additional specific per-function replacement information for the utility functions in the cgi module deprecated by PEP 594 (PEP-594).

@brettcannon , should this be backported (without the deprecated-removed , which I would update it accordingly and re-add in my other PR adding that to the others for 3.11+), or just go in 3.11+?
(cherry picked from commit 71354ad)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

…thonGH-92792)

Per @brettcannon 's [suggestions on the Discourse thread](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-594-take-2-removing-dead-batteries-from-the-standard-library/13508/51), discussed in pythonGH-92611 and as a followup to PR pythonGH-92612 , this PR add additional specific per-function replacement information for the utility functions in the `cgi` module deprecated by PEP 594 (PEP-594).

@brettcannon , should this be backported (without the `deprecated-removed` , which I would update it accordingly and re-add in my other PR adding that to the others for 3.11+), or just go in 3.11+?
(cherry picked from commit 71354ad)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 41964de into python:3.11 Jun 21, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-71354ad-3.11 branch June 21, 2022 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants