Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-96075: move interned dict under runtime state #96077

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 22, 2022

Conversation

kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 commented Aug 18, 2022

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:ericsnowcurrently

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Aug 18, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @kumaraditya303 for commit 415902a 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Aug 18, 2022
Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mostly LGTM

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants