-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PEP 710: elaborate on storing at least one hash #3884
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
CC @charliermarsh @zanieb @sethmlarson as per discussion on Discourse, please let us know if you are fine with this |
Thanks to Gregory P. Smith, Stéphane Bidoul, C.A.M. Gerlach, and Adam Turner | ||
for reviewing this PEP and providing valuable suggestions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Too kind!
I'm fine with it, thank you. |
b6b8dcb
to
6cb768f
Compare
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Pokorny <fridolin.pokorny@gmail.com>
6cb768f
to
f396d89
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pending one comment, looks good
``provenance_url.json`` file. However, the limitations affecting the | ||
auditability of Python environments should be taken into account. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think either remove this sentence or expand upon it (what limitations?). If you do keep it, note that the sentence on Line 443 also starts with "However,", so this one could be rephrased.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3884.org.readthedocs.build/