-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add deprecation classes in importlib.metadata #11118
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, LGTM, but one question.
if sys.version_info >= (3, 11): | ||
def __lt__(self, other: object) -> bool: ... | ||
if sys.version_info < (3, 12): | ||
def __iter__(self) -> Iterator[Any]: ... # result of iter((str, Self)), really |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So why not use Iterator[tuple[str, Self]]
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's an iterator that returns tuple[str, Self]
. This is an iterator that will always return two items, the first of which is str and the second of which is Self. As far as I know, there's no way to express that in the current system. We could do Iterator[str | Self]
, but my understanding is that it's better to avoid union return types.
The implementation here is return iter((self.name, self))
; I meant "iter()` as the runtime function, not a misspelling of the type, but that's a bit confusing because then I switched to the types of the values. Maybe the comment could be better worded, but I'm not sure how without getting too wordy. Might be better to just leave off the comment if it's too confusing. The function was removed in 3.12, so this is going away (eventually) anyway.
related to #3968
Generally speaking these classes print warnings and then call super().method() without changing anything's type signature, so they don't need much to be filled out here.