-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BitNet b1.58 training #930
Merged
Merged
Changes from 15 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6995ef3
first upstream of BitNet
gau-nernst 46668bf
fix type annotation
gau-nernst c5e382d
skip bitnet test on cpu. add bitnet to benchmark script
gau-nernst e3660eb
add bitnet option to example training script. update backward
gau-nernst 974cd54
add FSDP2 test
gau-nernst 36e60c4
remove FSDP2 mixed-precision workaround. cleanup test
gau-nernst 5d12448
fix typo
gau-nernst 62218ef
adjust tolerance
gau-nernst 6990b61
update command
gau-nernst 0e8f898
add precompute scale for FSDP2
gau-nernst d375fb2
fix typing
gau-nernst c966fce
add test for precompute scale
gau-nernst 521b04e
rename
gau-nernst b8b3b84
Merge branch 'pytorch:main' into bitnet_training
gau-nernst 6ab6863
Merge branch 'pytorch:main' into bitnet_training
gau-nernst cd3b784
Merge branch 'main' into bitnet_training
gau-nernst 2ca7460
separate BitNet model surgery
gau-nernst 1b5f616
minor fixes. add note on packing
gau-nernst 77d5c0d
Merge branch 'pytorch:main' into bitnet_training
gau-nernst File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
optional: this is "change model architecture and then do quantization" which is pretty different from just "quantization". For code clarity, maybe we can either have an explicit preprocessing step to be called separately, or call the arg something like
rmsnorm_model_surgery_then_quantize_bitnet
?