Single key option for Slicer and doc improvements #1041
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
ejguan
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2023
Comment on lines
+298
to
+303
| elif self.index in old_item.keys(): | ||
| new_item = {self.index: old_item.get(self.index)} # type: ignore[assignment] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TBH, dict is weird for slice.
|
@ejguan has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
NivekT
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2023
docs/source/reading_service.rst
Outdated
|
|
||
| - ``sharding_filter``: When the pipeline is replicable, each distributed/multiprocessing worker loads data from one replica of the ``DataPipe`` graph, and skip the data not blonged to the corresponding worker at the place of ``sharding_filter``. | ||
| - ``sharding_filter``: When the pipeline is replicable, each distributed/multiprocessing worker loads data from one replica of the ``DataPipe`` graph, and skips the data not belonging to the corresponding worker at the place of ``sharding_filter``. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FYI, I have a fix to this in a separate PR soon to land. Rebasing will be necessary
ejguan
force-pushed
the
docimprovements
branch
from
0643d6f
to
05299f5
Compare
|
@ejguan has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
NivekT
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
Summary: Single key option for Slicer and doc improvements ### Changes - Enable Slicer to also work for a single key + functional test - Fix typos in doc - Add laion-example to examples page Pull Request resolved: #1041 Reviewed By: NivekT Differential Revision: D43622504 Pulled By: ejguan fbshipit-source-id: b656082598f4a790dc457dddb0213a1a180239fd
NivekT
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
Summary: Single key option for Slicer and doc improvements ### Changes - Enable Slicer to also work for a single key + functional test - Fix typos in doc - Add laion-example to examples page Pull Request resolved: #1041 Reviewed By: NivekT Differential Revision: D43622504 Pulled By: ejguan fbshipit-source-id: b656082598f4a790dc457dddb0213a1a180239fd Co-authored-by: SvenDS9 <sven.braun@tngtech.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Single key option for Slicer and doc improvements
Changes