Skip to content

Conversation

DrJessop
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. For now, I am warning for all of these situations, but once I can run without warnings, will error out instead.

Differential Revision: D84650725

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 14, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/15130

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit bf10bf4 with merge base 8fa1e38 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Oct 14, 2025
Copy link

meta-codesync bot commented Oct 14, 2025

@DrJessop has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D84650725.

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

…ops (pytorch#15130)

Summary:

I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. Any current meta kernels that don't have a reference we will warn on, but anything new will error out if no reference is provided.

Differential Revision: D84650725
DrJessop pushed a commit to DrJessop/executorch that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025
…ops (pytorch#15130)

Summary:

I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. Any current meta kernels that don't have a reference we will warn on, but anything new will error out if no reference is provided.

Differential Revision: D84650725
@DrJessop DrJessop force-pushed the export-D84650725 branch 2 times, most recently from 8f73055 to bf10bf4 Compare October 14, 2025 22:25
DrJessop pushed a commit to DrJessop/executorch that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025
…ops (pytorch#15130)

Summary:

I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. Any current meta kernels that don't have a reference we will warn on, but anything new will error out if no reference is provided.

Differential Revision: D84650725
DrJessop pushed a commit to DrJessop/executorch that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…ops (pytorch#15130)

Summary:

I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. Any current meta kernels that don't have a reference we will warn on, but anything new will error out if no reference is provided.

Differential Revision: D84650725
DrJessop pushed a commit to DrJessop/executorch that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…ops (pytorch#15130)

Summary:

I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. Any current meta kernels that don't have a reference we will warn on, but anything new will error out if no reference is provided.

Differential Revision: D84650725
DrJessop pushed a commit to DrJessop/executorch that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…ops (pytorch#15130)

Summary:

I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. Any current meta kernels that don't have a reference we will warn on, but anything new will error out if no reference is provided.

Differential Revision: D84650725
DrJessop pushed a commit to DrJessop/executorch that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…ops (pytorch#15130)

Summary:

I ran into a problem where some new ops were checked into ops_registrations.py without an associated ref implementation. Any current meta kernels that don't have a reference we will warn on, but anything new will error out if no reference is provided.

Differential Revision: D84650725
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported meta-exported

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant