-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 712
[ET-VK] Implementation of to_dim_order_copy #15619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: gh/SS-JIA/355/base
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Title says it all! Previously, to_dim_order_copy was handled by removing the op. However, this is not possible if the op is modifying the dtype of the original tensor, so these instances of the op would be skipped by the partitioner. This diff adds an implementation dtype conversion, which allows to_dim_order_copy to be lowered. Differential Revision: [D86340341](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D86340341/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/15619
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New Failures, 2 Cancelled Jobs, 4 Unrelated FailuresAs of commit e70dd50 with merge base d361573 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
CANCELLED JOBS - The following jobs were cancelled. Please retry:
FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but was present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This PR needs a
|
Title says it all! Previously, to_dim_order_copy was handled by removing the op. However, this is not possible if the op is modifying the dtype of the original tensor, so these instances of the op would be skipped by the partitioner. This diff adds an implementation dtype conversion, which allows to_dim_order_copy to be lowered. Differential Revision: [D86340341](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D86340341/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Title says it all! Previously, to_dim_order_copy was handled by removing the op. However, this is not possible if the op is modifying the dtype of the original tensor, so these instances of the op would be skipped by the partitioner. This diff adds an implementation dtype conversion, which allows to_dim_order_copy to be lowered. Differential Revision: [D86340341](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D86340341/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Title says it all! Previously, to_dim_order_copy was handled by removing the op. However, this is not possible if the op is modifying the dtype of the original tensor, so these instances of the op would be skipped by the partitioner. This diff adds an implementation dtype conversion, which allows to_dim_order_copy to be lowered. Differential Revision: [D86340341](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D86340341/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Title says it all! Previously, to_dim_order_copy was handled by removing the op. However, this is not possible if the op is modifying the dtype of the original tensor, so these instances of the op would be skipped by the partitioner. This diff adds an implementation dtype conversion, which allows to_dim_order_copy to be lowered. Differential Revision: [D86340341](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D86340341/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Title says it all!
Previously, to_dim_order_copy was handled by removing the op. However, this is not possible if the op is modifying the dtype of the original tensor, so these instances of the op would be skipped by the partitioner.
This diff adds an implementation dtype conversion, which allows to_dim_order_copy to be lowered.
Differential Revision: D86340341