-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support flip and rot90 for complex dtype #37826
support flip and rot90 for complex dtype #37826
Conversation
@anjali411 @dylanbespalko Please review. |
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 12c3762 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
ci.pytorch.org: 1 failedThis comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. This comment has been revised 83 times. |
@kshitij12345 any updates? |
Hi, |
0de9bb7
to
db22d61
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking pretty good but a few questions/suggestions.
@pytorchbot retest this please! |
c755485
to
1e0623b
Compare
@mruberry @anjali411 PTAL:) |
tensor_op_tests compare device result with cpu result. So there is no point in having dtypes for CPU to compare against itself.
* add `rtol=0` in assertEqual call.
b01d217
to
de42c5d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mruberry has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
The Vander test failures are real:
|
Sounds good to me! Please re-request review when that happens. |
Do review. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mruberry has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
@mruberry Gentle ping |
Thanks @kshitij12345, internal tests looked good. I'll start landing now. |
Diff is landed and tests are now running on OSS Master to validate. |
Awesome! OSS Master validation tests look good. |
Great! Thanks. Will rebase #38599 and add tests. |
Closes #37698