-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SWAG Vision Transformer Weight #5714
Conversation
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit c36a3ec (more details on the Dr. CI page): ✅ None of the CI failures appear to be your fault 💚
🚧 2 ongoing upstream failures:These were probably caused by upstream breakages that are not fixed yet.
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @YosuaMichael. I've added a couple of comments but overall I like your approach:
…dle case where number of param differ from default due to different image size input
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good. Could you provide also the commands that you used to verify the model along with their output? Something similar to #5450 (comment) (note that the commands will be slightly different because the Multi-weight support API is out of prototype).
Co-authored-by: Vasilis Vryniotis <datumbox@users.noreply.github.com>
@datumbox here is the command I used for testing the
And here for
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot of the changes @YosuaMichael, everything looks good to me.
@mannatsingh Could you have also a look to let us know if all look good to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything looks perfect, thanks @YosuaMichael !
The failures are unrelated. cc @pmeier @YosuaMichael you are good to merge. |
Summary: * Add vit_b_16_swag * Better handling idiom for image_size, edit test_extended_model to handle case where number of param differ from default due to different image size input * Update the accuracy to the experiment result on torchvision model * Fix typo missing underscore * raise exception instead of torch._assert, add back publication year (accidentally deleted) * Add license information on meta and readme * Improve wording and fix typo for pretrained model license in readme * Add vit_l_16 weight * Update README.rst * Update the accuracy meta on vit_l_16_swag model to result from our experiment Reviewed By: NicolasHug Differential Revision: D35393156 fbshipit-source-id: d8e38f783c3c881cf8a8ce21d05a33671818be53 Co-authored-by: Vasilis Vryniotis <datumbox@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Vasilis Vryniotis <datumbox@users.noreply.github.com>
subtask of #5708
Adding weight of ViT_B_16 and ViT_L_16 model from https://github.com/facebookresearch/SWAG