-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove Linux GPU unittest from CircleCI #7354
Conversation
@@ -722,96 +722,6 @@ jobs: | |||
conda activate python${PYTHON_VERSION} | |||
python -c "import torchvision" | |||
|
|||
unittest_linux_cpu: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was forgotten in the PR that ported the CPU tests. Since unittest_linux_cpu
was not listed in the unittest
group (only visible in config.yml
, but not in this template), this job wasn't run.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Philip, I'll stamp, but let's wait from someone from nova before merging.
Just to confirm, are we sure that the removed GPU job is fully covered by GA already (in terms of Python version, etc)? And are we also sure that removing the CPU unittest job isn't going to affect the doc build (I remember discussing it with you recently)
Nope, coverage is not exactly the same: Lines 1344 to 1365 in cd33246
vision/.github/workflows/test-linux-gpu.yml Lines 18 to 20 in cd33246
For both we test Python 3.8, but on CircleCI we also test 3.9 and 3.10 on the
Yes, I'm sure. I was wrong back then. The docs workflow depends the build workflow Lines 1302 to 1312 in cd33246
And that one is untouched by this PR. On $ grep unittest_linux_cpu .circleci/config.yml | wc -l
1 Meaning, this job is only defined, but never used. For that, it needs to show up in any group at the bottom of the file. Preferably here Line 1339 in cd33246
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM thanks!
I've opened #7374 to keep track of handling the "main only" workflows later. |
Hey @pmeier! You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py |
Reviewed By: vmoens Differential Revision: D44416634 fbshipit-source-id: 3646166c5334aee6bbe3a7695183a9c371922a73
They were ported in #6804. There were some teething issues, but they have been running smoothly since at least one month now (#6957 (comment)).
cc @seemethere