Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use python 3.9 conda environment for cmake circleci workflows #7370

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 1, 2023

Conversation

atalman
Copy link
Contributor

@atalman atalman commented Mar 1, 2023

Use python 3.9 conda environment for cmake circleci workflows

@atalman atalman changed the title Use python 3.9 conda environment for cmake tests Use python 3.9 conda environment for cmake circleci workflows Mar 1, 2023
Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

stamping

@atalman
Copy link
Contributor Author

atalman commented Mar 1, 2023

@NicolasHug cherry-pick will be required. Merging this now since cmake is passing now

@atalman atalman merged commit 8499bc4 into pytorch:main Mar 1, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2023

Hey @atalman!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

NicolasHug pushed a commit to NicolasHug/vision that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
NicolasHug added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
…cleci workflows (#7370)  (#7371)

Co-authored-by: Philip Meier <github.pmeier@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Talman <atalman@fb.com>
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2023
#7370)

Reviewed By: vmoens

Differential Revision: D44416548

fbshipit-source-id: 8ec4efdd08bbfa88b1eb07316ab13af4fce82369
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants