Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Type Check for cocodetection dataset #8227

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

RazaProdigy
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #7824

###Key changes:

For now added type checking in getitem function of cocodetection (coco.py) to ensure value passed is int and not a slice.
Current getitem function does not handle slice inputs and returns wrong result.
We can also work on enhancing the code to allow for slice inputs. Please do let me know if this feature is required i can work on it.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 21, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8227

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 14 New Failures, 18 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 3187381 with merge base 6d64cb3 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Hi @RazaProdigy!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @RazaProdigy, and thanks @sadra-barikbin for the original report.

The changes LGTM. Before merging, could you please add a small non-regression test here:

Something like this (I haven't checked that it works):

    def test_slice_error(self):
        with self.create_dataset() as (dataset, _):
            with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Index must be of  type integer"):
                dataset[:2]

Thank you!

@RazaProdigy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NicolasHug Test seems to pass!
Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot @RazaProdigy

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit 8afd547 into pytorch:main Mar 13, 2024
9 of 32 checks passed
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
Reviewed By: vmoens

Differential Revision: D55062775

fbshipit-source-id: 3bfbb2e607b31373bece42ef449bebb863057b34

Co-authored-by: RazaProdigy <rizaidi@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Hug <nh.nicolas.hug@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

‍‍‍‍CocoDetection accepts slice as argument to its __getitem__ and returns wrong result
3 participants