NIID-Bench

This is the code of paper Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Study.

This code runs a benchmark for federated learning algorithms under non-IID data distribution scenarios. Specifically, we implement 4 federated learning algorithms (FedAvg, FedProx, SCAFFOLD & FedNova), 3 types of non-IID settings (label distribution skew, feature distribution skew & quantity skew) and 9 datasets (MNIST, Cifar-10, Fashion-MNIST, SVHN, Generated 3D dataset, FEMNIST, adult, rcv1, covtype).

Updates on NIID-Bench

To support more settings and faciliate future researches, we now integrate MOON. We add CIFAR-100 and Tiny-ImageNet.

Tiny-ImageNet

You can download Tiny-ImageNet here. Then, you can follow the instructions to reformat the validation folder.

Non-IID Settings

Label Distribution Skew

• Quantity-based label imbalance: each party owns data samples of a fixed number of labels.
• Distribution-based label imbalance: each party is allocated a proportion of the samples of each label according to Dirichlet distribution.

Feature Distribution Skew

• Noise-based feature imbalance: We first divide the whole datasetinto multiple parties randomly and equally. For each party, we adddifferent levels of Gaussian noises.
• Synthetic feature imbalance: For generated 3D data set, we allocate two parts which are symmetric of(0,0,0) to a subset for each party.
• Real-world feature imbalance: For FEMNIST, we divide and assign thewriters (and their characters) into each party randomly and equally.

Quantity Skew

• While the data distribution may still be consistent amongthe parties, the size of local dataset varies according to Dirichlet distribution.

Usage

Here is one example to run this code:

python experiments.py --model=simple-cnn \
    --dataset=cifar10 \
    --alg=fedprox \
    --lr=0.01 \
    --batch-size=64 \
    --epochs=10 \
    --n_parties=10 \
    --mu=0.01 \
    --rho=0.9 \
    --comm_round=50 \
    --partition=noniid-labeldir \
    --beta=0.5\
    --device='cuda:0'\
    --datadir='./data/' \
    --logdir='./logs/' \
    --noise=0 \
    --sample=1 \
    --init_seed=0

Parameter	Description
model	The model architecture. Options: simple-cnn, vgg, resnet, mlp. Default = mlp.
dataset	Dataset to use. Options: mnist, cifar10, fmnist, svhn, generated, femnist, a9a, rcv1, covtype. Default = mnist.
alg	The training algorithm. Options: fedavg, fedprox, scaffold, fednova. Default = fedavg.
lr	Learning rate for the local models, default = 0.01.
batch-size	Batch size, default = 64.
epochs	Number of local training epochs, default = 5.
n_parties	Number of parties, default = 2.
mu	The proximal term parameter for FedProx, default = 1.
rho	The parameter controlling the momentum SGD, default = 0.
comm_round	Number of communication rounds to use, default = 50.
partition	The partition way. Options: homo, noniid-labeldir, noniid-#label1 (or 2, 3, ..., which means the fixed number of labels each party owns), real, iid-diff-quantity. Default = homo
beta	The concentration parameter of the Dirichlet distribution for heterogeneous partition, default = 0.5.
device	Specify the device to run the program, default = cuda:0.
datadir	The path of the dataset, default = ./data/.
logdir	The path to store the logs, default = ./logs/.
noise	Maximum variance of Gaussian noise we add to local party, default = 0.
sample	Ratio of parties that participate in each communication round, default = 1.
init_seed	The initial seed, default = 0.

Data Partition Map

You can call function get_partition_dict() in experiments.py to access net_dataidx_map. net_dataidx_map is a dictionary. Its keys are party ID, and the value of each key is a list containing index of data assigned to this party. For our experiments, we usually set init_seed=0. When we repeat experiments of some setting, we change init_seed to 1 or 2. The default value of noise is 0 unless stated. We list the way to get our data partition as follow.

• Quantity-based label imbalance: partition=noniid-#label1, noniid-#label2 or noniid-#label3
• Distribution-based label imbalance: partition=noniid-labeldir, beta=0.5 or 0.1
• Noise-based feature imbalance: partition=homo, noise=0.1 (actually noise does not affect net_dataidx_map)
• Synthetic feature imbalance & Real-world feature imbalance: partition=real
• Quantity Skew: partition=iid-diff-quantity, beta=0.5 or 0.1
• IID Setting: partition=homo
• Mixed skew: partition = mixed for mixture of distribution-based label imbalance and quantity skew; partition = noniid-labeldir and noise = 0.1 for mixture of distribution-based label imbalance and noise-based feature imbalance.

Here is explanation of parameter for function get_partition_dict().

Parameter	Description
dataset	Dataset to use. Options: mnist, cifar10, fmnist, svhn, generated, femnist, a9a, rcv1, covtype.
partition	Tha partition way. Options: homo, noniid-labeldir, noniid-#label1 (or 2, 3, ..., which means the fixed number of labels each party owns), real, iid-diff-quantity
n_parties	Number of parties.
init_seed	The initial seed.
datadir	The path of the dataset.
logdir	The path to store the logs.
beta	The concentration parameter of the Dirichlet distribution for heterogeneous partition.

Leader Board

Note that the accuracy shows the average of three experiments, while the training curve is based on only one experiment. Thus, there may be some difference. We show the training curve to compare convergence rate of different algorithms.

Quantity-based label imbalance

• Cifar-10, 10 parties, sample rate = 1, batch size = 64, learning rate = 0.01

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	50	FedProx (mu=0.01)	50.7%
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	50	FedAvg	49.8%
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	50	SCAFFOLD	49.1%
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	50	FedNova	46.5%

• Cifar-10, 100 parties, sample rate = 0.1, batch size = 64, learning rate = 0.01

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	500	FedNova	48.0%
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	500	FedAvg	45.3%
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	500	FedProx (mu=0.001)	39.3%
noniid-#label2	simple-cnn	500	SCAFFOLD	10.0%

Distribution-based label imbalance

• Cifar-10, 10 parties, sample rate = 1, batch size = 64, learning rate = 0.01

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	SCAFFOLD	69.8%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	FedAvg	68.2%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	FedProx (mu=0.001)	67.9%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	FedNova	66.8%

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.1	vgg	100	SCAFFOLD	85.5%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.1	vgg	100	FedNova	84.4%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.1	vgg	100	FedProx (mu=0.01)	84.4%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.1	vgg	100	FedAvg	84.0%

• Cifar-10, 100 parties, sample rate = 0.1, batch size = 64, learning rate = 0.01

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	500	FedNova	60.0%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	500	FedAvg	59.4%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	500	FedProx (mu=0.001)	58.8%
noniid-labeldir with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	500	SCAFFOLD	10.0%

Noise-based feature imbalance

• Cifar-10, 10 parties, sample rate = 1, batch size = 64, learning rate = 0.01

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
homo with noise=0.1	simple-cnn	50	SCAFFOLD	70.1%
homo with noise=0.1	simple-cnn	50	FedProx (mu=0.01)	69.3%
homo with noise=0.1	simple-cnn	50	FedAvg	68.9%
homo with noise=0.1	simple-cnn	50	FedNova	68.5%

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
homo with noise=0.1	resnet	100	SCAFFOLD	90.2%
homo with noise=0.1	resnet	100	FedNova	89.4%
homo with noise=0.1	resnet	100	FedProx (mu=0.01)	89.2%
homo with noise=0.1	resnet	100	FedAvg	89.1%

Quantity Skew

• Cifar-10, 10 parties, sample rate = 1, batch size = 64, learning rate = 0.01

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
iid-diff-quantity with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	FedAvg	72.0%
iid-diff-quantity with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	FedProx (mu=0.01)	71.2%
iid-diff-quantity with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	SCAFFOLD	62.4%
iid-diff-quantity with beta=0.5	simple-cnn	50	FedNova	10.0%

IID Setting

• Cifar-10, 100 parties, sample rate = 0.1, batch size = 64, learning rate = 0.01

Partition	Model	Round	Algorithm	Accuracy
homo	simple-cnn	500	FedNova	66.1%
homo	simple-cnn	500	FedProx (mu=0.01)	66.0%
homo	simple-cnn	500	FedAvg	65.6%
homo	simple-cnn	500	SCAFFOLD	10.0%

Citation

If you find this repository useful, please cite our paper:

@inproceedings{li2022federated,
      title={Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Study},
      author={Li, Qinbin and Diao, Yiqun and Chen, Quan and He, Bingsheng},
      booktitle={IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering},
      year={2022}
}