Flux crosstalk computation with flux pulse amplitude

[andrea-pasquale]

In this PR I'm modifying the flux_amplitude_frequency protocol intially proposed in #974 to evaluate also flux crosstalk. This evaluation should be "more useful" compared to the one already available in main given that in this case I'm using flux_pulses.
Here are a few examples:
http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/PrWiWFppRtiyaTHy3jRocA==/
http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/h2SDjCTvTj66-XdkfUr1tg==/

Here is an example of the crosstalk matrix computed using qubits B3 and B4:

Currently the crosstalk is almost 3 orders of magnitude lower which is more or less expected. See for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.03347 and https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.03708.

According to the qua documentation https://docs.quantum-machines.co/latest/docs/Guides/features/?h=crosstalk#crosstalk-correction-matrix it seems that it should be possible to just provide this crosstalk matrix to correct the flux pulses.

TODO:

• update documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.64865% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.04%. Comparing base (4d45751) to head (2eba379).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/qibocal/calibration/calibration.py	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           test_cryoscope    #1061      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           96.98%   97.04%   +0.05%     
==================================================
  Files                 103      103              
  Lines                8362     8421      +59     
==================================================
+ Hits                 8110     8172      +62     
+ Misses                252      249       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	97.04% <98.64%> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/qibocal/protocols/flux_amplitude_frequency.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...bocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/cryoscope.py	98.31% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
src/qibocal/calibration/calibration.py	95.00% <83.33%> (-0.62%)	⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes