-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
Study autoloaded #3046
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Study autoloaded #3046
Conversation
* inject study_type in EBI and improvements to current automatic processing pipeline (qiita-spots#3023) * inject study_type in ebi and improvements to current automatic proecssing pipeline * addressing @ElDeveloper comments * some general fixes/additions for next release (qiita-spots#3026) * some general fixes/additions for next release * adding test for not None job.release_validator_job * fix qiita-spots#2839 * fix qiita-spots#2868 (qiita-spots#3028) * fix qiita-spots#2868 * 2nd round * fix errors * more changes * fix errors * fix ProcessingJobTest * fix PY_PATCH * add missing TRN.add * encapsulated_query -> perform_as_transaction * fix qiita-spots#3022 (qiita-spots#3030) * fix qiita-spots#3022 * adding tests * fix qiita-spots#2320 (qiita-spots#3031) * fix qiita-spots#2320 * adding prints to debug * children -> 1 * APIArtifactHandlerTest -> APIArtifactHandlerTests * configure_biom * qdb.util.activate_or_update_plugins * improving code * almost there * add values.template * fix filepaths * filepaths -> files * fixing errors * add prep.artifact insertion * addressing @ElDeveloper comments * fix artifact_definition active command * != -> == * Added three tutorial sections to the Qiita documentation (qiita-spots#3032) * Added three tutorial sections to the Qiita documentation: 'Retrieving Public Data for Own Analysis' and 'Processing public data retrieved with redbiom' to the redbiom tab, and 'Statistical Analysis to Justify Clinical Trial Sample Size Tutorial' to the analyzing samples tab. * Update redbiom.rst * Update redbiom.rst * Update redbiom.rst * Further updates to redbiom.rst and the Stats tutorial. * update redbiom.rst * Finished proof-reading * Placed all three tutorials/sections together under Introduction to the download and analysis of public Qiita data * added a new introduction, with links to the three sections * Added figures to stats tutorial and contexts explanation * Added figures to stats tutorial and contexts explanation * Apply suggestions from code review [skip ci] Co-authored-by: Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza <yoshiki@ucsd.edu> Co-authored-by: Antonio Gonzalez <antgonza@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza <yoshiki@ucsd.edu> * 092020 (qiita-spots#3033) * 092020 * connect artifact with job * rm INSERT qiita.artifact_processing_job * Apply suggestions from code review [skip ci] Co-authored-by: Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza <yoshiki@ucsd.edu> Co-authored-by: Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza <yoshiki@ucsd.edu> Co-authored-by: Daniel McDonald <danielmcdonald@ucsd.edu> Co-authored-by: Mirte Kuijpers <67341505+mcmk3@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza <yoshiki@ucsd.edu>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not familiar with the code for Qiita, but from what I can tell it looks like everything is set as expected for adding the autoloaded flag for setting and getting later.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #3046 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.03% 95.02% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 74 74
Lines 14284 14279 -5
==========================================
- Hits 13575 13569 -6
- Misses 709 710 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few small changes. Quick question, is this attribute going to be visible as a metadata column?
Co-authored-by: Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza <yoshiki@ucsd.edu>
Thank you for review; that's a good question! I don't think we should display it but it will be good to limit functionality for those studies we didn't submit ... |
Yes, I think I was thinking mostly in terms of a meta-analysis to easily check for systematic effects. |
Changes to support a study flag to mark as automatically loaded. In general, it should always be false, once we support autoloading we will use this flag.