Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cirque tap from secondary side of split keyboard #18351

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2022

Conversation

daskygit
Copy link
Member

Description

The use of pointing_device_set_report(mouse_report); and pointing_device_send(); won't work when the cirque is on the slave side of a split keyboard.

This is the least invasive fix/change that should sort the issue.

Types of Changes

  • Core
  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement/optimization
  • Keyboard (addition or update)
  • Keymap/layout/userspace (addition or update)
  • Documentation

Issues Fixed or Closed by This PR

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project: C, Python
  • I have read the PR Checklist document and have made the appropriate changes.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

@daskygit daskygit changed the title Fix cirque tap from secondary side Fix cirque tap from secondary side of split keyboard Sep 13, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the core label Sep 13, 2022
@drashna drashna requested a review from a team September 14, 2022 17:30
@drashna drashna merged commit 40b0b3a into qmk:develop Sep 15, 2022
@daskygit daskygit deleted the pr/fix_cirque_tap branch September 18, 2022 00:31
ramonimbao pushed a commit to ramonimbao/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants