Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt to fix CI for non-master branches. #9308

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2020

Conversation

tzarc
Copy link
Member

@tzarc tzarc commented Jun 5, 2020

Description

Actually fetch the branch we're attempting to compare against.

Types of Changes

  • Core
  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement/optimization
  • Keyboard (addition or update)
  • Keymap/layout/userspace (addition or update)
  • Documentation

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

@tzarc tzarc requested a review from a team June 5, 2020 11:08
@tzarc tzarc changed the base branch from master to develop June 5, 2020 11:15
@tzarc tzarc force-pushed the travis-fetch-correct-branch branch from 85bfa6a to 04b5cd0 Compare June 5, 2020 11:16
@skullydazed skullydazed requested a review from a team June 6, 2020 15:54
@tzarc tzarc merged commit c2ed231 into qmk:develop Jun 8, 2020
nicocesar pushed a commit to nicocesar/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2020
@tzarc tzarc deleted the travis-fetch-correct-branch branch September 10, 2020 02:27
kjganz pushed a commit to kjganz/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2020
BorisTestov pushed a commit to BorisTestov/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants