Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix data type for pr_files field in PR description prompts #1041

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

KennyDizi
Copy link
Contributor

@KennyDizi KennyDizi commented Jul 15, 2024

PR Type

bug_fix


Description

  • Fixed the data type of the pr_files field in pr_description_prompts.toml from [List[FileDescription]] to List[FileDescription]

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
pr_description_prompts.toml
Corrected data type for pr_files field in PR description prompt
settings

pr_agent/settings/pr_description_prompts.toml

  • Fixed the data type of the pr_files field from [List[FileDescription]]
    to List[FileDescription]
  • +1/-1     

    @KennyDizi KennyDizi changed the title Fix pr_files data type Fix data type for pr_files field in PR description prompts Jul 15, 2024
    @KennyDizi
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    👑 🌖 I've updated the PR description to match the latest commit (174b4b7).

    @KennyDizi
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    PR Analysis 🌗


    ⏰  Estimated effort to review: 2, as the changes are straightforward and localized.

    🥇  Score: 95, because the PR addresses a specific bug fix and implements a clear data type correction.

    🧪  No relevant tests

    🔒  No security concerns identified

    💡  Key issues to review

    Data Type Correction
    The data type for pr_files field was corrected from [List[FileDescription]] to List[FileDescription].

    Code Cleanup
    Unnecessary brackets removed from the pr_files field declaration.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    mrT23 commented Jul 16, 2024

    LGTM

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 1b2a207 into qodo-ai:main Jul 16, 2024
    1 check passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants