Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tr/ignore #966

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 15, 2024
Merged

Tr/ignore #966

merged 9 commits into from
Jun 15, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Jun 13, 2024

PR Type

enhancement, documentation


Description

  • Enhanced file ignore functionality to support multiple platforms (GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, Azure DevOps).
  • Fixed markdown formatting issues in utils.py.
  • Updated documentation to include examples for ignoring files using glob and regex patterns.
  • Logged filtered and invalid files in various git providers.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
7 files
file_filter.py
Enhance file ignore functionality for multiple platforms 

pr_agent/algo/file_filter.py

  • Added support for multiple platforms (GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, Azure
    DevOps) in file ignore functionality.
  • Enhanced the filter_ignored function to handle different file
    attribute structures.
  • +13/-2   
    language_handler.py
    Add type annotation to is_valid_file function                       

    pr_agent/algo/language_handler.py

    • Added type annotation to is_valid_file function.
    +1/-1     
    utils.py
    Fix markdown formatting and handle code tags                         

    pr_agent/algo/utils.py

  • Fixed markdown formatting issues by removing extra newlines.
  • Added replace_code_tags function to handle code tags in markdown.
  • +8/-6     
    azuredevops_provider.py
    Integrate file ignore functionality and log filtered files

    pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py

  • Integrated file ignore functionality.
  • Logged filtered and invalid files.
  • +15/-0   
    bitbucket_provider.py
    Integrate file ignore functionality and log filtered files

    pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py

  • Integrated file ignore functionality.
  • Logged filtered and invalid files.
  • +23/-1   
    github_provider.py
    Integrate file ignore functionality and log filtered files

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py

  • Integrated file ignore functionality.
  • Logged filtered and invalid files.
  • +25/-7   
    gitlab_provider.py
    Integrate file ignore functionality and log filtered files

    pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py

  • Integrated file ignore functionality.
  • Logged filtered and invalid files.
  • +60/-41 
    Documentation
    2 files
    additional_configurations.md
    Update documentation for file ignore patterns                       

    docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md

  • Updated documentation to include examples for ignoring files using
    glob and regex patterns.
  • +6/-1     
    ignore.toml
    Add regex pattern example in ignore settings                         

    pr_agent/settings/ignore.toml

    • Added example for regex pattern in ignore settings.
    +1/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @qodo-merge-pro qodo-merge-pro bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 4 labels Jun 13, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jun 13, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    (Review updated until commit e083841)

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 3
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    ⚡ Key issues to review Possible Bug:
    The 'filter_ignored' function in file_filter.py assumes that the 'files' parameter is always a list, which may not be true for all platforms. This could lead to errors if 'files' is not a list.
    Performance Concern:
    In the GitHub provider, converting the paginated files to a list (self.git_files = list(self.pr.get_files())) could be inefficient for very large PRs. Consider using pagination or lazy loading instead.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    CI Failure Feedback 🧐

    tags
    and the content within them.

    Action: build-and-test

    Failed stage: Test dev docker [❌]

    Failed test name: test_simple_dictionary_input

    Failure summary:

    The action failed because the test test_simple_dictionary_input in the file
    tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py failed.

  • The test failed due to an AssertionError.
  • The expected output from the convert_to_markdown function did not match the actual output.
  • The discrepancy appears to be in the formatting of the markdown table, specifically around the
  • Relevant error logs:
    1:  ##[group]Operating System
    2:  Ubuntu
    ...
    
    970:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_parse_pr_url PASSED [ 13%]
    971:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_is_valid_codecommit_hostname PASSED [ 14%]
    972:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_invalid_codecommit_url PASSED [ 16%]
    973:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_get_file_extensions PASSED [ 17%]
    974:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_get_language_percentages PASSED [ 18%]
    975:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_get_edit_type PASSED [ 20%]
    976:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_add_additional_newlines PASSED [ 21%]
    977:  tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_remove_markdown_html PASSED [ 22%]
    978:  tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py::TestConvertToMarkdown::test_simple_dictionary_input FAILED [ 24%]
    ...
    
    1005:  tests/unittest/test_find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file.py::TestFindLineNumberOfRelevantLineInFile::test_relevant_line_found_but_deleted PASSED [ 60%]
    1006:  tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions PASSED [ 61%]
    1007:  tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_new_line PASSED [ 62%]
    1008:  tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_many_close_brackets PASSED [ 64%]
    1009:  tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_relevant_file PASSED [ 65%]
    1010:  tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_enabled PASSED [ 66%]
    1011:  tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_disabled PASSED [ 68%]
    1012:  tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_notset PASSED [ 69%]
    1013:  tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_error_case PASSED [ 70%]
    ...
    
    1028:  tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py::TestParseCodeSuggestion::test_non_string_before_or_after PASSED [ 90%]
    1029:  tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py::TestParseCodeSuggestion::test_no_code_example_key PASSED [ 92%]
    1030:  tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py::TestParseCodeSuggestion::test_with_code_example_key PASSED [ 93%]
    1031:  tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_valid_yaml PASSED [ 94%]
    1032:  tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_add_relevant_line PASSED [ 96%]
    1033:  tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_extract_snippet PASSED [ 97%]
    1034:  tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_remove_last_line PASSED [ 98%]
    1035:  tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_empty_yaml_fixed PASSED [100%]
    1036:  =================================== FAILURES ===================================
    ...
    
    1040:  input_data = {'review': {
    1041:  'estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]': '1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n',
    1042:  'relevant_tests': 'No\n', 'possible_issues': 'No\n', 'security_concerns': 'No\n'}, 'code_feedback': [
    1043:  {'relevant_file': '``pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n``', 'language': 'python\n',
    1044:  'suggestion': "Consider raising an exception or logging a warning when 'pr_url' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of 'pr_url' in instances where it's expected. [important]\n",
    1045:  'relevant_line': '[return ""](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199)'}]}
    1046:  expected_output = '## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr>\n<tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪&nbsp;<strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> ⚡&nbsp;<strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒&nbsp;<strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
    1047:  >       assert convert_to_markdown(input_data).strip() == expected_output.strip()
    1048:  E       AssertionError: assert '## PR Review...n\n</details>' == '## PR Review...n\n</details>'
    ...
    
    1050:  E           
    1051:  E           <table>
    1052:  E         - <tr>
    1053:  E           <tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>
    1054:  E         - 
    1055:  E           1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition....
    1056:  E         
    1057:  E         ...Full output truncated (36 lines hidden), use '-vv' to show
    1058:  tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py:57: AssertionError
    ...
    
    1060:  tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:44
    1061:  /app/tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:44: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\.'
    1062:  monkeypatch.setattr(global_settings.ignore, 'regex', ['^file[2-4]\..*$'])
    1063:  tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:65
    1064:  /app/tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:65: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\.'
    1065:  monkeypatch.setattr(global_settings.ignore, 'regex', ['(((||', '^file[2-4]\..*$'])
    1066:  -- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
    1067:  =========================== short test summary info ============================
    1068:  FAILED tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py::TestConvertToMarkdown::test_simple_dictionary_input
    1069:  =================== 1 failed, 74 passed, 2 warnings in 2.14s ===================
    1070:  ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
    

    ✨ CI feedback usage guide:

    The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
    The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

    • Failed stage
    • Failed test name
    • Failure summary
    • Relevant error logs

    In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

    /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"
    

    where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

    Configuration options

    • enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
    • excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
    • enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
    • persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
    • final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

    See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jun 13, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Use a generator function to handle pagination when fetching files

    To handle pagination properly, consider using a generator function to yield files from the
    paginated response.

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py [110]

    -self.git_files = list(self.pr.get_files()) # 'list' to hanlde pagination
    +def get_all_files(pr):
    +    page = 1
    +    while True:
    +        files = pr.get_files(page=page)
    +        if not files:
    +            break
    +        yield from files
    +        page += 1
     
    +self.git_files = list(get_all_files(self.pr))
    +
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion addresses a significant issue with handling large sets of paginated data efficiently. Using a generator is an excellent enhancement for memory management and scalability.

    8
    Maintainability
    Use a dictionary to map platforms to their corresponding attribute or key checks for better maintainability

    Instead of checking the type of files and then checking attributes or keys for each
    platform, consider using a dictionary to map the platform to the corresponding attribute
    or key. This will make the code more maintainable and easier to extend for new platforms.

    pr_agent/algo/file_filter.py [31-43]

    +platform_checks = {
    +    'github': lambda f: f.filename,
    +    'bitbucket': lambda f: f.new.path,
    +    'gitlab': lambda f: f['new_path'],
    +    'azure': lambda f: f
    +}
    +
     if files and isinstance(files, list):
    -    if hasattr(files[0], 'filename'): # github
    -        for r in compiled_patterns:
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.filename and not r.match(f.filename))]
    -    elif hasattr(files[0], 'new') and hasattr(files[0].new, 'path'): # bitbucket
    -        for r in compiled_patterns:
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.new.path and not r.match(f.new.path))]
    -    elif isinstance(files[0], dict) and 'new_path' in files[0]: # gitlab
    -        for r in compiled_patterns:
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f['new_path'] and not r.match(f['new_path']))]
    -    elif isinstance(files[0], str): # azure devops
    -        for r in compiled_patterns:
    -            files = [f for f in files if not r.match(f)]
    +    for platform, check in platform_checks.items():
    +        if all(hasattr(files[0], attr) for attr in check.__code__.co_varnames):
    +            for r in compiled_patterns:
    +                files = [f for f in files if check(f) and not r.match(check(f))]
    +            break
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion improves maintainability by centralizing platform checks into a dictionary, making the code cleaner and easier to extend. It correctly identifies the relevant section of the code and proposes a more scalable solution.

    7
    Best practice
    Check if logging is enabled before attempting to log information to avoid unnecessary exceptions

    Instead of using a try-except block to handle logging, check if logging is enabled before
    attempting to log the information.

    pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py [292-296]

    -try:
    -    get_logger().info(f"Filtered out [ignore] files for pull request:", extra=
    +logger = get_logger()
    +if logger.isEnabledFor(logging.INFO):
    +    logger.info(f"Filtered out [ignore] files for pull request:", extra=
         {"files": diffs_original,  # diffs is just a list of names
          "filtered_files": diffs})
    -except Exception:
    -    pass
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion to check if logging is enabled before logging is a good practice to avoid unnecessary operations. It correctly targets the new logging code in the PR, making it more efficient.

    6
    Performance
    Use a set for bad_extensions to improve lookup performance in is_valid_file

    The is_valid_file function can be optimized by using a set for bad_extensions to improve
    lookup performance.

    pr_agent/algo/language_handler.py [19]

    -return filename.split('.')[-1] not in bad_extensions
    +bad_extensions_set = set(bad_extensions)
    +return filename.split('.')[-1] not in bad_extensions_set
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: Using a set for bad_extensions is a valid optimization for lookup performance. However, the impact is minor unless bad_extensions is very large, hence the moderate score.

    5

    @qodo-ai qodo-ai deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Jun 13, 2024
    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 13, 2024

    /improve

    @qodo-ai qodo-ai deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Jun 13, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Correct the example regex pattern in the comment to escape the backslash properly

    The example regex pattern provided in the comment should be corrected to escape the
    backslash properly to avoid syntax errors.

    pr_agent/settings/ignore.toml [11]

    -# for example: regex = ['.*\.toml$']
    +# for example: regex = ['.*\\.toml$']
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: The suggestion is crucial as it addresses a potential syntax error in regex patterns by ensuring the backslash is properly escaped, which is important for the correct functioning of the regex.

    10
    Enhancement
    Use a dictionary to map platforms to their respective file attributes to simplify the filtering logic

    Instead of checking if files is a list and then iterating over it, you can use a
    dictionary to map platforms to their respective file attribute and then use a single list
    comprehension.

    pr_agent/algo/file_filter.py [31-40]

    +platform_file_attr = {
    +    'github': 'filename',
    +    'bitbucket': 'new.path',
    +    'gitlab': 'new_path',
    +    'azure': None
    +}
     if files and isinstance(files, list):
         for r in compiled_patterns:
    -        if platform == 'github':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.filename and not r.match(f.filename))]
    -        elif platform == 'bitbucket':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.new.path and not r.match(f.new.path))]
    -        elif platform == 'gitlab':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f['new_path'] and not r.match(f['new_path']))]
    -        elif platform == 'azure':
    +        if platform_file_attr[platform]:
    +            files = [f for f in files if getattr(f, platform_file_attr[platform], None) and not r.match(getattr(f, platform_file_attr[platform]))]
    +        else:
                 files = [f for f in files if not r.match(f)]
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a way to simplify and optimize the filtering logic by using a dictionary, which enhances readability and maintainability.

    8
    Use a dictionary to map conditions to their respective edit types for better readability

    Instead of using multiple if-elif statements to determine the edit type, use a dictionary
    to map conditions to their respective edit types.

    pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py [120-126]

    -edit_type = EDIT_TYPE.MODIFIED
    -if diff['new_file']:
    -    edit_type = EDIT_TYPE.ADDED
    -elif diff['deleted_file']:
    -    edit_type = EDIT_TYPE.DELETED
    -elif diff['renamed_file']:
    -    edit_type = EDIT_TYPE.RENAMED
    +edit_type_conditions = {
    +    'new_file': EDIT_TYPE.ADDED,
    +    'deleted_file': EDIT_TYPE.DELETED,
    +    'renamed_file': EDIT_TYPE.RENAMED
    +}
    +edit_type = next((edit_type_conditions[key] for key in edit_type_conditions if diff[key]), EDIT_TYPE.MODIFIED)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion to use a dictionary for mapping edit types simplifies the code and improves readability, which is beneficial for maintenance and understanding the code logic.

    7
    Add an explanation about the difference between glob and regex patterns

    Add a brief explanation about the difference between glob and regex patterns to help users
    understand when to use each type of pattern.

    docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md [19]

    -To ignore Python files in all PRs using `regex` pattern, set in a configuration file:
    +To ignore Python files in all PRs using `regex` pattern, set in a configuration file (use `glob` for simpler wildcard patterns and `regex` for more complex matching):
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: This is a useful enhancement that adds educational value to the documentation by explaining the difference between glob and regex, aiding user understanding. However, it's not critical for functionality.

    6
    Performance
    Use a generator to handle pagination more efficiently when retrieving files

    To handle pagination more efficiently, consider using a generator to yield files instead
    of converting the paginated response to a list.

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py [110]

    -self.git_files = list(self.pr.get_files()) # 'list' to hanlde pagination
    +self.git_files = (file for file in self.pr.get_files()) # generator to handle pagination
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Using a generator for handling pagination is a valid and efficient improvement, especially for large datasets, which can improve memory usage and performance.

    7
    Check if logging is enabled before attempting to log filtered files

    Instead of using a try-except block to log the filtered files, use an if statement to
    check if logging is enabled, which is more efficient.

    pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py [290-296]

    -if diffs_original != diffs:
    -    try:
    -        get_logger().info(f"Filtered out [ignore] files for pull request:", extra=
    -        {"files": diffs_original,  # diffs is just a list of names
    -         "filtered_files": diffs})
    -    except Exception:
    -        pass
    +if diffs_original != diffs and get_logger().isEnabledFor(logging.INFO):
    +    get_logger().info(f"Filtered out [ignore] files for pull request:", extra=
    +    {"files": diffs_original,  # diffs is just a list of names
    +     "filtered_files": diffs})
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While the suggestion improves efficiency by checking if logging is enabled before logging, it addresses a minor performance issue and does not significantly impact the overall functionality.

    5
    Maintainability
    Reduce the number of newline characters in the expected_output string to improve readability and maintain consistency

    The expected_output string contains multiple newline characters (\n\n\n) which may not be
    necessary and could lead to formatting issues. Consider reducing the number of newline
    characters to improve readability and maintain consistency.

    tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py [55]

    -expected_output = '## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪&nbsp;<strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> ⚡&nbsp;<strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒&nbsp;<strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
    +expected_output = '## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪&nbsp;<strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> ⚡&nbsp;<strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒&nbsp;<strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr></n</table>\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies unnecessary newline characters in the expected_output string, which can improve readability. However, it's a minor formatting issue, not affecting functionality.

    5

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @barnett-yuxiang barnett-yuxiang left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    good

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit dd8a720 into main Jun 15, 2024
    1 check passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/ignore branch June 15, 2024 16:48
    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 15, 2024

    /review

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Persistent review updated to latest commit e083841

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 17, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                            &nbgsp;                                                                                                       Score
    Security
    Sanitize the value before including it in the HTML output to prevent XSS vulnerabilities

    To avoid potential XSS vulnerabilities, ensure that the value is properly sanitized before
    including it in the HTML output.

    pr_agent/algo/utils.py [111]

    -markdown_text += f"<tr><td> {emoji}&nbsp;<strong>{key_nice}</strong></td><td>\n{value}\n\n</td></tr>\n"
    +sanitized_value = sanitize_html(value)
    +markdown_text += f"<tr><td> {emoji}&nbsp;<strong>{key_nice}</strong></td><td>\n{sanitized_value}\n\n</td></tr>\n"
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Addressing potential security vulnerabilities such as XSS is critical. The suggestion to sanitize values before including them in HTML output is very important to ensure the security of the application.

    9
    Possible bug
    Add a check to ensure self.git_files is not None before accessing its attributes to prevent potential AttributeError

    Add a check to ensure self.git_files is not None before accessing its attributes to
    prevent potential AttributeError.

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py [119-125]

    -if hasattr(self.git_files, "totalCount"):
    +if self.git_files and hasattr(self.git_files, "totalCount"):
         return self.git_files.totalCount
     else:
         try:
    -        return len(self.git_files)
    +        return len(self.git_files) if self.git_files else -1
         except Exception as e:
             return -1
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion addresses a potential bug where self.git_files could be None, leading to an AttributeError. Adding a null check before accessing attributes is a crucial safety measure.

    7
    Maintainability
    Break down the long string into multiple lines using triple quotes for better readability and maintainability

    To improve readability and maintainability, consider breaking down the expected_output
    string into multiple lines using triple quotes (""") and concatenation. This will make it
    easier to read and modify in the future.

    tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py [55]

    -expected_output = '## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪&nbsp;<strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> ⚡&nbsp;<strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒&nbsp;<strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
    +expected_output = (
    +    """## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n"""
    +    """1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n"""
    +    """<tr><td> 🧪&nbsp;<strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n"""
    +    """<tr><td> ⚡&nbsp;<strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n"""
    +    """<tr><td> 🔒&nbsp;<strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n"""
    +    """<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\n"""
    +    """Consider raising an exception or logging a warning when 'pr_url' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of 'pr_url' in instances where it's expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr>\n"""
    +    """<tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href='https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>"""
    +)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an improvement in readability and maintainability by breaking down a long string into multiple lines using triple quotes. This is a good practice for managing long strings in Python.

    7
    Best practice
    Move logging of filtered files outside the try-except block to avoid masking potential issues

    The logging of filtered files should be done outside the try-except block to ensure that
    logging errors do not interfere with the main logic.

    pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py [290-296]

     if diffs_original != diffs:
    -    try:
    -        get_logger().info(f"Filtered out [ignore] files for pull request:", extra=
    -        {"files": diffs_original,  # diffs is just a list of names
    -         "filtered_files": diffs})
    -    except Exception:
    -        pass
    +    get_logger().info(f"Filtered out [ignore] files for pull request:", extra=
    +    {"files": diffs_original,  # diffs is just a list of names
    +     "filtered_files": diffs})
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: This is a valid suggestion to improve error handling by ensuring that logging errors do not interfere with the main logic. It's a good practice to separate error handling from the main functionality.

    6
    Enhancement
    Add explanations about the difference between glob and regex patterns for better clarity

    To ensure consistency and clarity, consider adding a brief explanation about the
    difference between glob and regex patterns before providing the examples.

    docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md [13-23]

     To ignore Python files in all PRs using `glob` pattern, set in a configuration file:

    [ignore]
    glob = ['*.py']

    +`glob` patterns are simpler and match file names using wildcards.
    +
    And to ignore Python files in all PRs using `regex` pattern, set in a configuration file:
    

    [regex]
    regex = ['.*.py$']

    +`regex` patterns are more powerful and match file names using regular expressions.
    
    
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion is valid and would enhance the documentation by clarifying the difference between glob and regex patterns, which is useful for users unfamiliar with these concepts.

    6
    Add multiple regex patterns in the example comment to illustrate different use cases

    To provide a more comprehensive example, consider adding multiple regex patterns in the
    example comment to illustrate different use cases.

    pr_agent/settings/ignore.toml [11]

    -# for example: regex = ['.*\.toml$']
    +# for example: regex = ['.*\.toml$', '.*\.log$', '.*\.bak$']
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: Adding multiple regex patterns as examples would indeed provide a clearer illustration of potential use cases, enhancing the documentation's utility. However, it's a minor enhancement.

    5
    Performance
    Combine checks for files being a list and iterating over compiled_patterns to improve readability and efficiency

    Instead of checking if files is a list and then iterating over compiled_patterns multiple
    times, consider combining these checks to improve readability and efficiency.

    pr_agent/algo/file_filter.py [31-40]

    -if files and isinstance(files, list):
    +if isinstance(files, list):
         for r in compiled_patterns:
             if platform == 'github':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.filename and not r.match(f.filename))]
    +            files = [f for f in files if f.filename and not r.match(f.filename)]
             elif platform == 'bitbucket':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.new.path and not r.match(f.new.path))]
    +            files = [f for f in files if f.new.path and not r.match(f.new.path)]
             elif platform == 'gitlab':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f['new_path'] and not r.match(f['new_path']))]
    +            files = [f for f in files if f['new_path'] and not r.match(f['new_path'])]
             elif platform == 'azure':
                 files = [f for f in files if not r.match(f)]
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential improvement in combining checks for efficiency. However, the improvement is minor and mostly affects readability rather than performance significantly.

    5
    • I have reviewed the code suggestions and addressed the relevant ones.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 17, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Update the example regex pattern to use double backslashes for correct escaping in TOML format

    The example regex pattern should be updated to use double backslashes (\) to escape the
    dot (.) character correctly in TOML format.

    pr_agent/settings/ignore.toml [11]

    -# for example: regex = ['.*\.toml$']
    +# for example: regex = ['.*\\.toml$']
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: This is a crucial fix as it corrects the syntax for regex patterns in TOML, ensuring that the configuration file is parsed correctly and functions as intended.

    10
    Performance
    Check if files is a list before the loop to avoid unnecessary iterations

    Instead of checking if files is a list within the loop, it would be more efficient to
    check it once before the loop and return early if it's not a list. This avoids unnecessary
    iterations and makes the code cleaner.

    pr_agent/algo/file_filter.py [31-40]

    -if files and isinstance(files, list):
    -    for r in compiled_patterns:
    -        if platform == 'github':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.filename and not r.match(f.filename))]
    -        elif platform == 'bitbucket':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f.new.path and not r.match(f.new.path))]
    -        elif platform == 'gitlab':
    -            files = [f for f in files if (f['new_path'] and not r.match(f['new_path']))]
    -        elif platform == 'azure':
    -            files = [f for f in files if not r.match(f)]
    +if not files or not isinstance(files, list):
    +    return files
    +for r in compiled_patterns:
    +    if platform == 'github':
    +        files = [f for f in files if (f.filename and not r.match(f.filename))]
    +    elif platform == 'bitbucket':
    +        files = [f for f in files if (f.new.path and not r.match(f.new.path))]
    +    elif platform == 'gitlab':
    +        files = [f for f in files if (f['new_path'] and not r.match(f['new_path']))]
    +    elif platform == 'azure':
    +        files = [f for f in files if not r.match(f)]
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a performance improvement by reducing the number of checks inside the loop. This change makes the code more efficient and cleaner.

    7
    Store the result of list(self.pr.get_files()) in a variable to avoid redundant calls

    Instead of using list(self.pr.get_files()) twice, store the result in a variable and reuse
    it. This avoids redundant calls and improves readability.

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py [110-112]

    -self.git_files = list(self.pr.get_files()) # 'list' to hanlde pagination
    -context["git_files"] = self.git_files
    -return self.git_files
    +files = list(self.pr.get_files()) # 'list' to handle pagination
    +self.git_files = files
    +context["git_files"] = files
    +return files
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion improves code efficiency and readability by reducing redundant calls to self.pr.get_files(), correctly addressing a performance issue.

    7
    Optimize is_valid_file by using str.rsplit with a maximum split of 1

    The is_valid_file function can be optimized by using str.rsplit with a maximum split of 1,
    which is more efficient than str.split when only the last part of the string is needed.

    pr_agent/algo/language_handler.py [18-19]

     def is_valid_file(filename: str):
    -    return filename.split('.')[-1] not in bad_extensions
    +    return filename.rsplit('.', 1)[-1] not in bad_extensions
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion correctly proposes using str.rsplit for efficiency when only the last part of the string is needed, which is a valid optimization for the is_valid_file function.

    6
    Enhancement
    Add an explanation about the difference between glob and regex patterns for better user understanding

    Add a brief explanation about the difference between glob and regex patterns to help users
    understand when to use each option.

    docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md [19]

    -To ignore Python files in all PRs using `regex` pattern, set in a configuration file:
    +To ignore Python files in all PRs using `regex` pattern, set in a configuration file (note: `regex` patterns offer more flexibility and precision compared to `glob` patterns):
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding an explanation enhances documentation clarity and helps users make informed decisions between glob and regex patterns. This is a valuable enhancement for user understanding.

    7
    Maintainability
    Reduce the number of newline characters in the expected_output string to improve readability and maintain consistency

    The expected_output string contains multiple newline characters (\n\n\n) which may not be
    necessary and could lead to formatting issues. Consider reducing the number of newline
    characters to improve readability and maintain consistency.

    tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py [55]

    -expected_output = '## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪&nbsp;<strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> ⚡&nbsp;<strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒&nbsp;<strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
    +expected_output = '## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr><td> ⏱️&nbsp;<strong>Estimated&nbsp;effort&nbsp;to&nbsp;review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪&nbsp;<strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> ⚡&nbsp;<strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒&nbsp;<strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>\n<strong>\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n</details>'
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies unnecessary newline characters in the expected_output string, which can improve readability. However, it's a minor formatting issue, not affecting functionality.

    6
    Combine the two try blocks into one to reduce redundancy and improve readability

    Combine the two try blocks into one to reduce redundancy and improve readability. This
    also ensures that the logging happens only once.

    pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [130-174]

     try:
         names_original = [d.new.path for d in diffs_original]
         names_filtered = [d.new.path for d in diffs]
         get_logger().info(f"Filtered out [ignore] files for PR", extra={
             'original_files': names_original,
             'filtered_files': names_filtered
         })
    +    get_logger().info(f"Invalid file names: {invalid_files_names}")
     except Exception as e:
         pass
    -...
    -try:
    -    get_logger().info(f"Invalid file names: {invalid_files_names}")
    -except Exception:
    -    pass
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion to combine try blocks is a good practice for maintainability and reducing redundancy. However, it's a minor improvement in terms of overall impact on the codebase.

    5
    • Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 17, 2024

    /review

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Persistent review updated to latest commit e083841

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 19, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 19, 2024

    Incremental PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏮️ Review for commits since previous PR-Agent review Starting from commit 1070f95.

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 3
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    ⚡ Key issues to review Possible Bug:
    The filter_ignored function in file_filter.py has been modified to include a platform parameter, but the default value is 'github'. This might not be clear or expected behavior for all use cases. Consider handling the default case more explicitly or documenting this behavior.
    Refactoring Concern:
    The filter_ignored function now includes conditional logic for different platforms. This approach might lead to difficulties in maintaining and extending this function in the future as more platforms or special cases are added. Consider using a strategy pattern or similar design pattern to handle platform-specific differences more cleanly.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 19, 2024

    Incremental Review Skipped
    No files were changed since the previous PR Review

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 19, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 19, 2024

    Persistent review updated to latest commit e083841

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Jun 22, 2024

    Persistent review updated to latest commit e083841

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 3
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants