Java 12 build fails: Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory #1534

chris922 · 2019-03-16T12:09:16Z

This issue looks very similar to #819, but it is a different class (from probably the same library):

Running our build with Quarkus 0.11.0 on JDK 12 fails:

Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory

java.lang.RuntimeException: 
org.jboss.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.deployment.logging.LoggingResourceProcessor#setupLoggingRuntimeInit threw an exception: java.lang.Error: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.deployment.logging.LoggingResourceProcessor#setupLoggingStaticInit threw an exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory
Caused by: org.jboss.builder.BuildException: 
Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.deployment.logging.LoggingResourceProcessor#setupLoggingRuntimeInit threw an exception: java.lang.Error: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.deployment.logging.LoggingResourceProcessor#setupLoggingStaticInit threw an exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory
Caused by: java.lang.Error: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override

You will find the full build-output here: https://travis-ci.org/mapstruct/mapstruct-examples/jobs/506375906 (I am not sure if these logs will be discarded after time).

Java version details:

openjdk version "12" 2019-03-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 12+33)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 12+33, mixed mode, sharing)

In case you need more information please let me know.

(nevertheless, thank you very much for Quarkus - just did a few tests with the library and it looks gorgeous!)

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

fbricon · 2019-03-23T23:32:31Z

Issue is still present with Quarkus 0.12.0

[INFO] --- quarkus-maven-plugin:0.12.0:dev (default-cli) @ todo-quarked ---
[INFO] Using javaTool: /Users/fbricon/.sdkman/candidates/java/12.0.0-open/bin/java
[INFO] Using servlet resources /Users/fbricon/Dev/souk/todo-quarked/src/main/resources/META-INF/resources
Listening for transport dt_socket at address: 5005
19:28:25,165 INFO  [io.qua.dep.QuarkusAugmentor] Beginning quarkus augmentation
19:28:25,432 INFO  [org.jbo.threads] JBoss Threads version 3.0.0.Alpha4
19:28:25,638 WARN  [io.qua.config] Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.undertow.resources" provided
19:28:25,651 ERROR [io.qua.dev.DevModeMain] Failed to start quarkus: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.jboss.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.deployment.logging.LoggingResourceProcessor#setupLoggingStaticInit threw an exception: java.lang.Error: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override
	at io.quarkus.runner.RuntimeRunner.run(RuntimeRunner.java:134)
	at io.quarkus.dev.DevModeMain.doStart(DevModeMain.java:105)
	at io.quarkus.dev.DevModeMain.main(DevModeMain.java:66)
Caused by: org.jboss.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
	[error]: Build step io.quarkus.deployment.logging.LoggingResourceProcessor#setupLoggingStaticInit threw an exception: java.lang.Error: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override
	at org.jboss.builder.Execution.run(Execution.java:123)
	at org.jboss.builder.BuildExecutionBuilder.execute(BuildExecutionBuilder.java:136)
	at io.quarkus.deployment.QuarkusAugmentor.run(QuarkusAugmentor.java:110)
	at io.quarkus.runner.RuntimeRunner.run(RuntimeRunner.java:99)
	... 2 more
Caused by: java.lang.Error: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override
	at org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory$1.run(DefaultClassFactory.java:55)
	at org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory$1.run(DefaultClassFactory.java:44)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:551)
	at org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory.<init>(DefaultClassFactory.java:44)
	at org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory.<clinit>(DefaultClassFactory.java:38)
	at org.jboss.classfilewriter.ClassFile.defineInternal(ClassFile.java:298)
	at org.jboss.classfilewriter.ClassFile.define(ClassFile.java:277)
	at org.jboss.invocation.proxy.AbstractClassFactory.defineClass(AbstractClassFactory.java:200)
	at org.jboss.invocation.proxy.AbstractClassFactory.newInstance(AbstractClassFactory.java:263)
	at org.jboss.invocation.proxy.ProxyFactory.newInstance(ProxyFactory.java:270)
	at io.quarkus.deployment.recording.BytecodeRecorderImpl$MethodRecorder.getRecordingProxy(BytecodeRecorderImpl.java:190)
	at io.quarkus.deployment.recording.BytecodeRecorderImpl.getRecordingProxy(BytecodeRecorderImpl.java:150)
	at io.quarkus.deployment.ExtensionLoader.lambda$loadStepsFrom$64(ExtensionLoader.java:411)
	at io.quarkus.deployment.ExtensionLoader$1.execute(ExtensionLoader.java:502)
	at org.jboss.builder.BuildContext.run(BuildContext.java:413)
	at org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1998)
	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1525)
	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1416)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:835)
	at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:479)
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: override
	at java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredField(Class.java:2417)
	at org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory$1.run(DefaultClassFactory.java:53)
	... 20 more

gsmet · 2019-03-25T15:57:19Z

@stuartwdouglas @dmlloyd I see there is now a ClassFactory abstraction in jboss-classfilewriter but AFAICS the only implementation in the jar is one not suitable for JDK 12.

Is there any plan to fix that?

(with Quarkus being bleeding edge, there's a good chance people will play with it with the latest JDKs)

dmlloyd · 2019-03-25T16:25:22Z

I believe that the preferred solution is still to drop jboss-classfilewriter but I don't think anyone is working that change at the moment.

gunnarmorling · 2019-04-18T20:18:09Z

Just running into this with JDK 13; reading the discussion in #819, would it perhaps make sense to use ByteBuddy for that proxy generation?

dmlloyd · 2019-05-07T14:15:35Z

We already have a number of bytecode creation tools at our disposal. I'd say that we should use Gizmo to generate these proxies; it shouldn't be too hard to do.

patelapurv16 · 2019-06-04T14:19:44Z

Happened to come across the same issue with JRE 12, but the issue is solved with JRE 8.

rsvoboda · 2019-06-24T09:14:43Z

@dmlloyd @stuartwdouglas any plans to make Quarkus run on java 12 and java 13 ?

dmlloyd · 2019-06-24T13:01:07Z

Some day, for sure, because we'll want to support the next LTS version. But supporting 11 is a prerequisite.

krzyk · 2019-07-02T16:40:48Z

I just want to support what was written in #1534 (comment):

(with Quarkus being bleeding edge, there's a good chance people will play with it with the latest JDKs)

I use JDK 12 (with --enable-preview - it would be good to test if preview features also work with byte code generator you are using) and plan to test out JDK 13 before it is released. And I also wanted to give Quarkus a chance, but lack of latest Java version support for a bleeding edge is quite sad.

JurrianFahner · 2019-08-16T19:33:10Z

The problem stil exists in 0.21.1 version

gsmet · 2019-08-21T14:07:33Z

Yes, it does, we haven't changed anything in this regard.

The idea is that we should get rid of the JBoss Invocation dependency which uses JBoss ClassFileWriter:

import org.jboss.invocation.proxy.ProxyConfiguration;
import org.jboss.invocation.proxy.ProxyFactory;

It's used in BytecodeRecorderImpl and QuarkusUnitTest AFAICS.

As they are build time code and test infrastructure, I think we can use a dynamic proxy. It will be a bit more code but it should work OK.

@gwenneg interested in this one?

gwenneg · 2019-08-21T18:22:00Z

@gsmet Yes, I'll gladly help on this one. I'm not sure there will be a PR ready for 0.22.0 though, I'll be pretty busy until the release.

geoand · 2019-09-01T22:19:48Z

@gwenneg Is this something you started looking into? If not, I think it's something I can potentially get in before the next release

gwenneg · 2019-09-01T22:35:10Z

@geoand I took a quick look at it and didn't find how to solve this with dynamic proxies only, then I started looking for a way to do it with Gizmo but I didn't spend much time on it and won't be able to until 0.22.0. Do not hesitate do submit a PR to fix this issue in 0.22.0 :)

geoand · 2019-09-01T22:37:38Z

Thanks for the info. I'll take a look at a Gizmo based solution, hopefully I can have it in time for 0.22

geoand · 2019-09-01T23:26:45Z

Now that I think about it more it might not be wise to get such a change in so close to release even if I do have a proper replacement.
In any case I'll work on it and we'll see how it goes.

This is first step to allow the project to build on JDK 12+ Relates to: quarkusio#1534

geoand · 2019-09-02T17:35:50Z

I opened #3810 that allows for removing jboss-invocation but doesn't yet allow building on JDK 12 (although it gets closer than the current state)

This makes sense for Quarkus where the ClassLoader is under our control. The benefit is that proxy classes can be generated no matter what JDK version is being used (so now proxies can be generated even in JDK 12+) Fixes: quarkusio#1534

geoand · 2019-09-06T13:39:29Z

#3906 should take care of the issue for good

- quarkusio/quarkus#1534 - quarkusio/quarkus#4151

gsmet added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Mar 25, 2019

gsmet modified the milestone: 0.13.0 Mar 25, 2019

dmlloyd mentioned this issue Mar 29, 2019

Build with java 12 fails quarkusio/quarkus-quickstarts#124

Closed

gsmet mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2019

Does not start with JDK12 #1917

Closed

danielhelfand mentioned this issue Jun 27, 2019

Warning About OpenJDK 12 for Step 2 of QUARKUS - GET STARTED quarkusio/quarkusio.github.io#244

Closed

gwenneg self-assigned this Aug 21, 2019

geoand added a commit to geoand/quarkus that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2019

Replace jboss-invocation with Gizmo based ProxyFactory

51910fe

This is first step to allow the project to build on JDK 12+ Relates to: quarkusio#1534

gwenneg assigned geoand and unassigned gwenneg Sep 2, 2019

geoand mentioned this issue Sep 6, 2019

Use custom ClassLoader with visible defineClass when generating proxies #3906

Merged

geoand closed this as completed in #3906 Sep 6, 2019

gsmet added this to the 0.23.0 milestone Sep 12, 2019

nmasse-itix added a commit to nmasse-itix/rhforum-2019-quotegame that referenced this issue Apr 21, 2020

Bump quarkus version when required

00aa12f

- quarkusio/quarkus#1534 - quarkusio/quarkus#4151

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Java 12 build fails: Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory #1534

Java 12 build fails: Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory #1534

chris922 commented Mar 16, 2019

fbricon commented Mar 23, 2019

gsmet commented Mar 25, 2019

dmlloyd commented Mar 25, 2019

gunnarmorling commented Apr 18, 2019

dmlloyd commented May 7, 2019

patelapurv16 commented Jun 4, 2019

rsvoboda commented Jun 24, 2019

dmlloyd commented Jun 24, 2019

krzyk commented Jul 2, 2019

JurrianFahner commented Aug 16, 2019

gsmet commented Aug 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

gwenneg commented Aug 21, 2019

geoand commented Sep 1, 2019

gwenneg commented Sep 1, 2019

geoand commented Sep 1, 2019

geoand commented Sep 1, 2019

geoand commented Sep 2, 2019

geoand commented Sep 6, 2019

Java 12 build fails: Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory #1534

Java 12 build fails: Could not initialize class org.jboss.classfilewriter.DefaultClassFactory #1534

Comments

chris922 commented Mar 16, 2019

fbricon commented Mar 23, 2019

gsmet commented Mar 25, 2019

dmlloyd commented Mar 25, 2019

gunnarmorling commented Apr 18, 2019

dmlloyd commented May 7, 2019

patelapurv16 commented Jun 4, 2019

rsvoboda commented Jun 24, 2019

dmlloyd commented Jun 24, 2019

krzyk commented Jul 2, 2019

JurrianFahner commented Aug 16, 2019

gsmet commented Aug 21, 2019 • edited Loading

gwenneg commented Aug 21, 2019

geoand commented Sep 1, 2019

gwenneg commented Sep 1, 2019

geoand commented Sep 1, 2019

geoand commented Sep 1, 2019

geoand commented Sep 2, 2019

geoand commented Sep 6, 2019

gsmet commented Aug 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading