Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

org.jboss.shamrock.deployment.recording.ObjectSubstitution should be moved to runtime module #573

Closed
starksm64 opened this issue Jan 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

org.jboss.shamrock.deployment.recording.ObjectSubstitution should be moved to runtime module #573

starksm64 opened this issue Jan 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
@starksm64
Milestone
0.7.0

Comments

@starksm64
Copy link
Contributor

The org.jboss.shamrock.deployment.recording.ObjectSubstitution should be moved to the runtime module to allow extensions with runtime classes that need to be serialized in deployment and unserialized during runtime, e.g., io.undertow.servlet.api.ServletSecurityInfo.

PR to follow.
@starksm64 starksm64 mentioned this issue Jan 19, 2019
Merged
@starksm64 starksm64 self-assigned this Jan 19, 2019
@cescoffier cescoffier added this to the 0.7.0 milestone Jan 21, 2019
@cescoffier cescoffier mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2022
Closed
maxandersen pushed a commit to maxandersen/quarkus that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2022
@quintesse
Fix zero-install (quarkusio#573)
48f6aeb 
* refactor: improve zero-install scripts for Windows a bit

* fix: Windows scripts were not creating default JDK link

* fix: PowerShell didn't pass on arguments correctly in zero-install case
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@starksm64 starksm64

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.7.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@stuartwdouglas @starksm64 @cescoffier