Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow specifying per-port nodePort #17659

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2021
Merged

Allow specifying per-port nodePort #17659

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2021

Conversation

geoand
Copy link
Contributor

@geoand geoand commented Jun 3, 2021

Resolves: #17582

@geoand
Copy link
Contributor Author

geoand commented Jun 3, 2021

@iocanel can you take a look at this one? It would be nice to get into 2.0.0.CR3 :)

Copy link
Contributor

@iocanel iocanel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

It might make sense to match using the port name instead of/in addition to the target port.

@geoand
Copy link
Contributor Author

geoand commented Jun 4, 2021

LGTM.

It might make sense to match using the port name instead of/in addition to the target port.

Good idea! I updated the PR

@geoand geoand added the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label Jun 4, 2021
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Jun 4, 2021

This workflow status is outdated as a new workflow run has been triggered.

Failing Jobs - Building 164116f

Status Name Step Test failures Logs Raw logs
Initial JDK 11 Build Build ⚠️ Check → Logs Raw logs

@geoand geoand merged commit bffe513 into quarkusio:main Jun 4, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 2.1 - main milestone Jun 4, 2021
@geoand geoand deleted the #17582 branch June 4, 2021 13:11
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot removed the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label Jun 4, 2021
@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 2.1 - main, 2.0.0.Final Jun 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NodePort cannot be defined if the service contains several ports
3 participants