Switch to UBI 9 by default

[cescoffier]

• Update UBI 8 and UBI 9 versions (including OpenJDK images)
• Switch the default to UBI 9

This commit does not cover the builder images and the quarkus-micro images, as they are not yet available using UBI9.

Fix #45968.

[quarkus-bot]

/cc @Karm (awt), @galderz (awt)

[gsmet]

Thanks!

[geoand]

Nice!

[github-actions]

🙈 The PR is closed and the preview is expired.

[jerboaa]

Small typo.

[jerboaa]

LGTM

[jerboaa]

I've mentioned this elsewhere but if any of the Quarkus container files use JAVA_OPTIONS environment variable from the OpenJDK images, this variable is gone with UBI9. Replaced by JAVA_OPTS, preferred migration env would be JAVA_OPTS_APPEND.

[gsmet]

@jerboaa Thanks, at the very least, this will need to be added to the migration guide.

[cescoffier]

Some of the failures are definitely related.

Also about @jerboaa's note, I've added it to the epic (so we won't forget)

[cescoffier]

On Hold - See quarkusio/quarkus-images#286. We cannot update the builder image. It should not affect this PR, but there are a few mysteries to understand.

One of them is:

Error: preparing container 72ea63962af25eacc70e94f256ebd468df6e4067ce8bbf3078cf1d50a96775e2 for attach: crun: open executable: Permission denied: OCI permission denied

Even with no changes, I cannot execute my container on my Mac anymore. I needed to change my Dockerfile to add more permissions. I need to make sure our current setup works before merging this.

[cescoffier]

Related to #45968

At the moment we have:

• runtime images are now using UBI 9 (both JVM, native, and micro)
• builder images are now using UBI 9 (GraalVM and Mandrel)
• documentation is updated (as well as the template) to indicate how to switch back to UBI 8 builder images

What's missing is the JAVA_OPTS change

[gsmet]

@cescoffier I just rebased because one of my PRs conflicted with this one.

[cescoffier]

This is hopefully ready.

[gsmet]

It looks good overall but I added two questions.

[quarkus-bot]

Status for workflow Quarkus Documentation CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus Documentation CI on commit 317fab5.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

Warning

There are other workflow runs running, you probably need to wait for their status before merging.

[gsmet]

LGTM!

[quarkus-bot]

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit 317fab5.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

You can consult the Develocity build scans.

---

Flaky tests - Develocity

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 17

📦 extensions/micrometer-opentelemetry/deployment

✖ io.quarkus.micrometer.opentelemetry.deployment.compatibility.MicrometerTimedInterceptorTest.testTimeMethod_AsyncFailed - History

• Stream has no elements - java.lang.IllegalArgumentException

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Stream has no elements
	at io.quarkus.micrometer.opentelemetry.deployment.common.MetricDataFilter.lambda$lastReading$2(MetricDataFilter.java:213)
	at java.base/java.util.Optional.orElseThrow(Optional.java:403)
	at io.quarkus.micrometer.opentelemetry.deployment.common.MetricDataFilter.lastReading(MetricDataFilter.java:213)
	at io.quarkus.micrometer.opentelemetry.deployment.common.MetricDataFilter.lastReadingDataPoint(MetricDataFilter.java:231)
	at io.quarkus.micrometer.opentelemetry.deployment.compatibility.MicrometerTimedInterceptorTest.testTimeMethod_AsyncFailed(MicrometerTimedInterceptorTest.java:150)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:569)
	at io.quarkus.test.QuarkusUnitTest.runExtensionMethod(QuarkusUnitTest.java:513)

📦 integration-tests/grpc-hibernate

✖ com.example.grpc.hibernate.VertxBlockingRawTest.shouldAdd - History

• Condition with Lambda expression in com.example.grpc.hibernate.BlockingRawTestBase was not fulfilled within 30 seconds. - org.awaitility.core.ConditionTimeoutException

org.awaitility.core.ConditionTimeoutException: Condition with Lambda expression in com.example.grpc.hibernate.BlockingRawTestBase was not fulfilled within 30 seconds.
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionAwaiter.await(ConditionAwaiter.java:167)
	at org.awaitility.core.CallableCondition.await(CallableCondition.java:78)
	at org.awaitility.core.CallableCondition.await(CallableCondition.java:26)
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.until(ConditionFactory.java:1006)
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.until(ConditionFactory.java:975)
	at com.example.grpc.hibernate.BlockingRawTestBase.shouldAdd(BlockingRawTestBase.java:59)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:569)

[gsmet]

@cescoffier we need an entry in the migration guide for this one!

[cescoffier]

@gsmet Done - I had a draft ready.