Added info about loading qudt with other ontology libraries #843
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vChavezB
requested review from
steveraysteveray,
ralphtq and
jhodgesatmb
as code owners
vChavezB
force-pushed
the
protege-import-qudt-doc
branch
from
57421bb
to
70bd017
Compare
vChavezB
changed the title
|
Based on feedback from @steveraysteveray in #842 (comment). I have updated this PR. |
There are some ontology libraries that cannot load correctly qudt. This updates the readme to make software developers aware of this issue.
vChavezB
force-pushed
the
protege-import-qudt-doc
branch
from
70bd017
to
e55b940
Compare
steveraysteveray
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are some ontology libraries that cannot load correctly qudt. This updates
the readme to make software developers aware of this issue.
This PR allows user to be aware of the issue I posted in #842