Mention Active Job integration in the README

[giovannibonetti]

Thank you for this great library!

I've read the discussion on #127 and it seems like now there is great Active Job integration, so maybe it would be nice to document it so that new users can easily find it and decide to use it.

It took me a while to find this library because it is not mentioned in the Rails Guides, even though it is mentioned in the API docs. It seems like the guides are more beginner-friendly and have links specific to the README section explaining how to integrate the library with Active Job. Hence if we have that section in the README we could have a link from Rails Guides pointing directly to it which would bring people here.

What do you think?

[siegy22]

Hey there!

Que moved: https://github.com/que-rb/que
Can you reopen your PR on the repository there so we can have a look at it?
(Automatically transfered)

[giovannibonetti]

Hi! It seems we are already on the new repository: #231

Doesn't it work the way it is now?

[siegy22]

Yeah forget my comment, we first forked the repository but then decided to transfer it to the organization.

[siegy22]

My opinion (and goal) on this for que 1.0:

• We should provide a rails generator to install que, something like rails g que:install which should generate the migration and change the active record dump to structure.sql.
• We should have clear documentation paths what's rails specific and what's not.

(Just a general notice for myself here) 😄

[siegy22]

I think you mean Active Job, right?

[giovannibonetti]

When I read this part of the code I thought the database connection was managed by Active Record. In fact I think you can use Que with Active Record without using Active Job at all, but I might be wrong.

Does that make sense?

[siegy22]

Ah. Now I get it. This says that que will automatically use the Active Record connection.

I think the pick up is confusing. Can we use something like:

Que will automatically use the database configuration of your rails application.

[giovannibonetti]

Done. Anything else?

[siegy22]

@giovannibonetti Maybe you missed my feedback on the second part. So see this message as a friendly "ping", because I'm really looking forward to have this in the README!

[giovannibonetti]

All right, I didn't notice that part. I will change it now. 👍

[siegy22]

I'm not a native english speaker, so if you disagree, feel free to keep it as is.

[giovannibonetti]

I'm not either, but your suggestion looks good, so I think it is worth the change! 👍

[siegy22]

Thanks for your contribution! 💚

[giovannibonetti]

You're welcome! 😀