-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add editing some new values in RPU Editor #57
Comments
So you basically want to be able to change the global L6 metadata? |
Those values are inside So yes @quietvoid, that's right. Thanks! |
Edited when already existing, created when not. Implements #57
Implemented. There is an example JSON here: https://github.com/quietvoid/dovi_tool/blob/main/assets/editor_examples/level6_metadata.json |
Thank you very much @quietvoid! |
@quietvoid I think there is a small mistake in the new editor.md:
I think this should look like this:
Thanks! |
That's true. Thanks. |
Hi!
Currently the RPU editor supports editing of the
min_pq
andmax_pq
values.Would it be possible to implement new values to edit in the RPU Editor?
I mean these specifically:
max_display_mastering_luminance
min_display_mastering_luminance
max_content_light_level
max_frame_average_light_level
This is because sometimes I have had a HDR video (from UHD) and a DV video (from WEB).
The UHD video contains those 4 values, and the RPU extracted from the WEB video contains the
max_display_mastering_luminance
andmin_display_mastering_luminance
values with exactly the same values as the UHD video, but themax_content_light_level
andmax_frame_average_light_level
values are set to 0... And, as I mentioned before, in the UHD those 2 values were set with a value that is not 0.So, I have thought that if it is set to 0 it is equivalent to not being set, correct?
And in that case, I suppose it would be appropriate and advisable to replace the 0 RPU values with the HDR video values.
So you can take advantage of those values that are available thanks to the other video.
This is correct? Or is it not appropriate?
I guess it is correct since the other 2 values match exactly in both video sources.
Thanks and regards!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: